The AcT trial (Alteplase Compared to Tenecteplase) compares alteplase or tenecteplase for patients with acute ischemic stroke. All eligible patients are enrolled by deferral of consent. Although the use of deferral of consent in the AcT trial meets the requirements of Canadian policy, we sought to provide a more explicit and rigorous approach to the justification of deferral of consent organized around 3 questions. Ultimately, the approach we outline here could become the foundation for a general justification for deferral of consent.
Axonal degeneration is a common feature of multiple neurodegenerative diseases, yet the mechanisms underlying its various manifestations are incompletely understood. We previously demonstrated that axonal degeneration is associated with externalization of phosphatidylserine (PS), which precedes morphological evidence of degeneration, is redox-sensitive, and is delayed in Wallerian degeneration slow (WldS) mutant animals. Phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) is the other major membrane phospholipid in the inner leaflet of the cell membrane, and given that PS signals apoptosis, phagocytosis, and degeneration, we hypothesized that PS and PE membrane dynamics play distinct roles in axonal degeneration. To test this hypothesis, axonal degeneration was induced with calcium ionophores in postnatal rat retinal ganglion cells, and PS- and PE-specific fluorescent probes used to measure their externalization over time. In untreated cells, cell-surface PS was prominent in the cell body alone. Elevation of intracellular calcium with calcium ionophores resulted in significantly increased levels of PS externalization in the cell body, axon, and axon growth cone. Unlike PS, cell-surface PE was diffusely distributed in untreated cells, with comparable levels across the soma, axons, and axon terminals. After exposure to calcium ionophores, PE externalization significantly increased in the cell body and axon. Elevated intracellular calcium also resulted in the formation of axonal blebs which exclusively contained externalized PS, but not PE. Together, these results indicated distinct patterns of externalized PS and PE in normal and degenerating neurons, suggesting a differential role for these phospholipids in transducing neuronal injury.
The challenges of conducting hyperacute stroke research and obtaining informed consent have been increasingly recognized within the stroke research community in recent years. Deferral of consent, in which a patient is enrolled in a trial and then provides consent at some point thereafter, is increasingly used to enroll patients into hyperacute stroke trials in Canada and Europe, though it is not permitted in the United States. Deferral of consent offers several potential advantages – quicker door-to-randomization, increased enrolment, decreased selection bias – but these must be balanced against the risk of enrolling patients against their wishes. We seek to minimize the attendant risks of deferral of consent by offering practical guidance regarding how to conduct acute stroke trials using deferral of consent. Building upon existing guidelines and recent experiences with deferral of consent in acute stroke trials, we have developed a protocol for the use of deferral of consent that aims to maximize patient involvement while minimizing ethical and scientific risks.
Background Palliative sedation and analgesia are employed in patients with refractory and intractable symptoms at the end of life to reduce their suffering by lowering their level of consciousness. The doctrine of double effect, a philosophical principle that justifies doing a “good action” with a potentially “bad effect,” is frequently employed to provide an ethical justification for this practice. Main text We argue that palliative sedation and analgesia do not fulfill the conditions required to apply the doctrine of double effect, and therefore its use in this domain is inappropriate. Furthermore, we argue that the frequent application of the doctrine of double effect to palliative sedation and analgesia reflects physicians’ discomfort with the complex moral, intentional, and causal aspects of end-of-life care. Conclusions We are concerned that this misapplication of the doctrine of double effect can consequently impair physicians’ ethical reasoning and relationships with patients at the end of life.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.