Objective: Systematically review the evaluation and impact of online health education interventions: assess approaches used, summarize main findings, and identify knowledge gaps. Data Source: We searched the following databases: EMBASE, ERIC, MEDLINE, and Web of Science. Study Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria: Studies were included if (a) published in English between 2010-2020 in a peer-reviewed journal (b) reported an online health education intervention aimed at consumers, caregivers, and the public (c) evaluated implementation OR participant outcomes (d) included ≥ 100 participants per study arm. Data Extraction: Two authors extracted data using a standardized form. Data Synthesis: Data synthesis was structured around the primary outcomes of the included studies. Results: 26 studies met the inclusion criteria. We found substantial heterogeneity in study population, design, intervention, and primary outcomes, and significant methodological issues that resulted in moderate to high risk of bias. Overall, interventions that were available to all (e.g., on YouTube) consistently attained a large global reach, and knowledge was consistently improved. However, the impact on other outcomes of interest (e.g., health literacy, health behaviors) remains unclear. Conclusion: Evidence around the impacts of the type of online health education interventions assessed in this review is sparse. A greater understanding of who online interventions work for and what outcomes can be achieved is crucial to determine, and potentially expand, their place in health education.
Introduction Containment measures implemented to minimize the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) are reported to be negatively affecting mental health, diet, and alcohol consumption. These factors, as well as poor cardiometabolic health and insufficient physical and cognitive activity, are known to increase the risk of developing dementia. COVID‐19 “lockdown” measures may have exacerbated these dementia risk factors among people in mid‐to‐later life. Methods We compared longitudinal data from before (October 2019) and during (April‐June 2020) the first COVID‐19 lockdown period in Tasmania, Australia. Participants (n = 1671) were 50+ years of age and engaged in a public health program targeting dementia risk reduction, with one‐third participating in the Preventing Dementia Massive Open Online Course (PD‐MOOC). Regression models were used to assess changes in smoking, alcohol use, body mass index (BMI), diet, physical exercise, cognitive and social activity, anxiety and depression, and management of cholesterol, diabetes, and blood pressure. Where significant changes were noted, the moderating influence of being in current employment, living with others, and completing the PD‐MOOC was tested. Results Although friend networks contracted marginally during lockdown, no detrimental effects on modifiable dementia risk factors were noted. Anxiety levels and alcohol consumption decreased, there was no change in depression scores, and small but significant improvements were observed in cognitive and physical activity, smoking, diet, and BMI. Stronger improvements in cognitive activity were observed among people who were cohabiting (not living alone) and both cognitive activity and adherence to the MIND diet (Mediterranean‐DASH diet Intervention for Neurological Delay) improved more for people who participated in the PD‐MOOC. Discussion Longitudinal data did not show widespread negative effects of COVID‐19 lockdown on modifiable dementia risk factors in this sample. The results counter the dominant narratives of universal pandemic‐related distress and suggest that engaging at‐risk populations in proactive health promotion and education campaigns during lockdown events could be a protective public health strategy.
Dementia is a global public health priority and risk reduction is an important pillar of the public health response. While 40% of cases are estimated to be attributable to modifiable health and lifestyle risk factors, public awareness of the evidence is low, limiting peoples’ opportunity to adopt risk-reducing behaviours. To address this gap, we designed, implemented, and evaluated an educational intervention, the Preventing Dementia Massive Open Online Course (PDMOOC). This mixed-methods study examined the reach and impact of the free and globally available PDMOOC, to assess its potential to provide effective dementia risk reduction education to a broad international audience. Over 100,000 individuals participated in the PDMOOC across seven iterations from 2016 to 2020, with 55,739 of these consenting to participate in research. Their mean age was 49 years (SD = 15), they came from 167 different countries, and the majority were female (86%), had completed post-secondary education (77%), lived in high-income countries (93%) and worked in health care and social assistance (63%). This demographic profile changed across time, with more men, people with higher education and people from low- and middle-income countries participating in recent course iterations. Two-thirds of participants completed the PDMOOC; completion was associated with being aged 50 to 70 years, residing in a high-income country, having tertiary education, and working in the health sector. Participants reported high levels of satisfaction with the PDMOOC, improved dementia risk reduction understanding and self-efficacy, increased motivation to maintain healthy lifestyles, and, importantly, application of their learning to health behaviour change with the potential to reduce their dementia risk. The PDMOOC educated a large global audience about dementia risk reduction, which contributed to participants making risk-reducing behaviour changes. This suggests MOOCs can be a successful public health strategy to improve dementia risk reduction understanding.
Background The Preventing Dementia Massive Open Online Course (PD‐MOOC) is one of several initiatives aiming to increase dementia risk knowledge and promote risk‐reducing behaviour. These initiatives primarily reach advantaged individuals, increasing health inequities. Previously, thematic analysis of PD‐MOOC participant feedback identified frequent reports of sharing dementia risk information with others. Interpersonal communication often introduces information to people from a broader demographic and may increase the impact of dementia risk education. This study investigated the diffusion of dementia risk reduction knowledge and behaviour beyond PD‐MOOC participants. Method The PD‐MOOC attracted over 99,000 enrolments from 2016 to 2019. Responses to surveys completed by participants before (demographics) and after (course feedback) the PD‐MOOC were analysed. Qualitative statements were characterised using key word filtering and subsequent thematic analysis. Chi‐squared tests of homogeneity with Bonferroni adjustments for multiple comparisons were used to determine significant information sharing patterns. Result Older people, females, health sector workers and people with a post‐secondary education were over‐represented among PD‐MOOC participants. Participants expressed an eagerness to share the MOOC with others, with 98.8% of respondents agreeing they “would recommend the MOOC to others”. 25% of responding participants discussed sharing PD‐MOOC information in their response to the question “If you have already applied your MOOC learning, please tell us how”. Among those who reported sharing information with specific people, family members were mentioned most frequently, followed by friends and colleagues. Significantly more responses discussed sharing information with males than females (p < 0.001) and with people outside the health sector than within (p < 0.001). Some participants reported sharing information about specific risk domains; physical activity was mentioned most frequently, followed by cognitive stimulation and diet. Additionally, some reported that the person with whom they shared information altered their behaviour; increased physical activity was most commonly reported, followed by a general improved lifestyle and a change in diet. Conclusion Information sharing transmits dementia risk information to, and promotes behaviour change among, people who are demographically less represented in the PD‐MOOC, extending the reach and impact of this educational intervention. The PD‐MOOC enables dementia risk reduction beyond those educated.
Background: Modifiable risk factors for dementia account for 40% of cases worldwide and exert impacts on risk across the life course. To have maximal public health impact, dementia risk-reduction initiatives need to reach a large and diverse audience, including people from a wide range of ages and socioeconomic backgrounds. Currently, dementia risk-reduction interventions primarily reach a narrow audience, consisting largely of highly educated older adults from high income countries. Methods: In this commentary, we review established dissemination models to identify strategies that could be used to extend and broaden the reach of dementia risk-reduction initiatives. Three potential reach-broadening strategies can be identified from these models: engaging with distinct user groups; focusing on interpersonal communication; and utilising dissemination agents. Results: Engaging with distinct user groups and utilising dissemination agents show promise for broadening the reach of dementia risk-reduction initiatives, while interpersonal communication has received limited attention in this context. Further evaluation of the impact of interpersonal communication may provide avenues to take advantage of this dissemination method. Conclusions: Based on the reviewed models and data from current risk-reduction initiatives, we suggest that utilising all three of these strategies may most effectively broaden the reach of dementia risk-reduction initiatives. This may promote risk reduction among a larger and more diverse audience, more equitably reducing the global impact of dementia.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.