Introduction: Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) is a major cause of death and disability in children worldwide. Apart from supportive care, the only established treatment for HIE is therapeutic hypothermia (TH). As TH is only partly neuroprotective, there is a need for additional therapies. Intermittent periods of limb ischemia, called remote ischemic postconditioning (RIPC), have been shown to be neuroprotective after HIE in rats and piglets. However, it is unknown whether RIPC adds to the effect of TH. We tested the neuroprotective effect of RIPC with TH compared to TH alone using magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy (MRI/MRS) in a piglet HIE model. Methods: Thirty-two male and female piglets were subjected to 45-min global hypoxia-ischemia (HI). Twenty-six animals were randomized to TH or RIPC plus TH; six animals received supportive care only. TH was induced through whole-body cooling. RIPC was induced 1 h after HI by four cycles of 5 min of ischemia and 5 min of reperfusion in both hind limbs. Primary outcome was Lac/NAA ratio at 24 h measured by MRS. Secondary outcomes were NAA/Cr, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), arterial spin labeling, aEGG score, and blood oxygen dependent (BOLD) signal measured by MRI/MRS at 6, 12, and 24 h after the hypoxic-ischemic insult. Results: All groups were subjected to a comparable but mild insult. No difference was found between the two intervention groups in Lac/NAA ratio, NAA/Cr ratio, DWI, arterial spin labeling, or BOLD signal. NAA/Cr ratio at 24 h was higher in the two intervention groups compared to supportive care only. There was no difference in aEEG score between the three groups. Andelius et al. Remote Postconditioning and Neonatal Encephalopathy Conclusion: Treatment with RIPC resulted in no additional neuroprotection when combined with TH. However, insult severity was mild and only evaluated at 24 h after HI with a short MRS echo time. In future studies more subtle neurological effects may be detected with increased MRS echo time and post mortem investigations, such as brain histology. Thus, the possible neuroprotective effect of RIPC needs further evaluation.

No abstract

Decreased heart rate variability (HRV) may be a biomarker of brain injury severity in neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy for which therapeutic hypothermia is standard treatment. While therapeutic hypothermia may influence the degree of brain injury; hypothermia may also affect HRV per se and obscure a potential association between HRV and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Previous results are conflicting. This study aimed to investigate the effect of hypothermia on HRV in healthy, anaesthetised, newborn piglets. Six healthy newborn piglets were anaesthetised. Three piglets were first kept normothermic (38.5–39.0 °C) for 3 h, then exposed to hypothermia (33.5–34.5 °C) for 3 h. Three piglets were first exposed to hypothermia for 3 h, then rewarmed to normothermia for 3 h. Temperature and ECG were recorded continuously. HRV was calculated from the ECG in 5 min epochs and included time domain and frequency domain variables. The HRV variables were compared between hypothermia and normothermia. All assessed HRV variables were higher during hypothermia compared to normothermia. Heart rate was lower during hypothermia compared to normothermia and all HRV variables correlated with heart rate. Hypothermia was associated with an increase in HRV; this could be mediated by bradycardia during hypothermia.

Background: Despite therapeutic hypothermia, neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy still develop neurological disabilities. We have previously investigated neuroprotection by remote ischemic postconditioning (RIPC) in newborn piglets following hypoxia-ischemia (HI). The aim of this study was to further investigate potential effects of RIPC on cerebral immunohistochemical markers related to edema, apoptosis, and angiogenesis. Methods: Brain expression of aquaporin 4, caspase-3, B-cell lymphoma 2, and vascular endothelial growth factor was analyzed by immunohistochemistry in 23 piglets, randomly selected from a larger study of RIPC after HI. Twenty animals were subjected to 45-minutes HI and randomized to treatment with and without RIPC, while three animals were randomized to sham procedures. RIPC was conducted by four conditioning cycles of five-minutes ischemia and reperfusion. Piglets were euthanized 72 hours after the HI insult. Results: Piglets subjected to HI treated with and without RIPC were similar at baseline and following the HI insult. However, piglets randomized to HI alone had longer duration of low blood pressure during the insult. We found no differences in the brain expression of the immunohistochemical markers in any regions of interest or the whole brain between the two HI groups. Conclusions: RIPC did not influence brain expression of markers related to edema, apoptosis, or angiogenesis in newborn piglets at 72 hours after HI. These results support previous findings of limited neuroprotective effect by this RIPC protocol. Our results may have been affected by the time of assessment, use of fentanyl as anesthetic, or limitations related to our immunohistochemical methods.