Phytosterols have been proposed to act as potent anticancer agents. However the mechanism of their action has not been elucidated yet. Thus, the aim of our study was to determine whether plant sterols and their thermal processing products (in physiological concentration range) could influence the viability of cancer cells and thus could be considered as positive diet complements. Additionally we decided to study potential specificity of those natural compounds against cells showing high multidrug resistance. In this study we show that the cytotoxic effect of β-sitosterol was observed in both, estrogen-dependent and estrogen-independent cells. It was also shown that the β-sitosterol was significantly more cytotoxic in cells with basal ABCB1 expression (MCF7) than in multidrug resistant NCI/ADR-RES. Surprisingly, 5a,6a-epoxysitosterol did not decrease the viability of any investigated cells but on the contrary, it provoked their increased proliferation. It was shown that oxyphytosterols blocked the cell cycle of MCF7 cells in G0/G1 phase while did not affect NCI/ADR-RES cell cycle in physiological concentration range. We also show that PgP activity (responsible for Multidrug Resistance phenomena) is inhibited by β-sitosterol. Thus, the phytosterols are supposed to act at various mechanisms but, what is most interesting, can target cells showing high multidrug resistance potential.
The CXCL12-3' G801A transition (rs1801157) has been associated with the incidence of breast cancer. However, the contribution of CXCL12-3' G801A polymorphisms in breast cancer development and progression has been controversial. Therefore, we examined the incidence of CXCL12-3' G801A polymorphic variants in patients with breast cancer (n = 193) and controls (n = 199) in a Polish cohort. We observed a trend of slightly increased presence of CXCL12-3' AA and GA genotypes and CXCL12-3'A allele frequency in patients with breast cancer compared with healthy individuals. However, these differences between cases and controls were not statistically significant. Odds ratio (OR) for patients with breast cancer and the CXCL12-3' A/A genotype was 1.898 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.6242-5.770, p = 0.2866) and OR of the CXCL12-3' A/A and A/G genotypes was 1.229 (95% CI = 0.8082-1.868, p = 0.3395). OR for the CXCL12-3'A allele frequency was 1.249 (95% CI = 0.8716-1.789, p = 0.2352). Our investigation did not support the CXCL12-3'A gene variant as a risk factor for breast cancer incidence in a sample of the Polish population.
The contribution of the CCL2 -2518 A>G (rs 1024611) polymorphism in the occurrence and progression of various cancers has been found to be discordant. We studied the prevalence of the CCL2 -2518 A>G polymorphism in patients with breast cancer (n = 160) and controls (n = 323) in a sample of the Polish population. There were no significant differences in CCL2 -2518 A>G genotypes between patients with breast tumors and controls. Odds ratio (OR) for patients bearing the GG genotype was 1.481 (95% CI = 0.7711-2.845, P = 0.2358), and OR of the GG and AG genotypes was 0.7269 (95% CI = 0.4967-1.064, P = 0.1002). There was also no significant distinction in the prevalence of alleles between patients and healthy individuals. OR for the CCL2 -2518 G allele frequency was 0.8903 (95% CI = 0.6611-1.199, P = 0.4441). Analysis of the association between tumor size, lymph node metastases, histological grade, and distribution of genotypes and alleles for the CCL2 -2518 A>G polymorphism also did not show significant differences. Our results did not show association of the CCL2 -2518 A>G polymorphism with breast cancer occurrence and clinical characteristics in a sample of the Polish cohort.
In a sample of the Polish population, we observed that the MDM2 285C gene variant may be a significant protective factor against breast cancer.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.