A defining feature of sleep is reduced responsiveness to external stimuli, but the mechanisms mediating sensory-evoked arousal remain unclear. We hypothesized that reduced locus coeruleus (LC) norepinephrine (NE) activity during sleep mediates unresponsiveness, and its action promotes sensory-evoked awakenings. We tested this using electrophysiological, behavioral, pharmacological, and optogenetic techniques alongside auditory stimulation in freely behaving rats. We found that systemic reduction in NE signaling lowered probability of sound-evoked awakenings (SEAs). The level of tonic LC activity during sleep anticipated SEAs. Optogenetic LC activation promoted arousal as evident in sleep-wake transitions, EEG desynchronization, and pupil dilation. Minimal LC excitation before sound presentation increased SEA probability. Optogenetic LC silencing using a soma-targeted anion-conducting channelrhodopsin (stGtACR2) suppressed LC spiking and constricted pupils. Brief periods of LC opto-silencing reduced the probability of SEAs. Thus, LC-NE activity determines the likelihood of sensory-evoked awakenings, and its reduction during sleep constitutes a key factor mediating behavioral unresponsiveness.
During sleep, sensory stimuli rarely trigger a behavioral response or conscious perception. However, it remains unclear whether sleep inhibits specific aspects of sensory processing, such as feedforward or feedback signaling. Here, we presented auditory stimuli (for example, click-trains, words, music) during wakefulness and sleep in patients with epilepsy, while recording neuronal spiking, microwire local field potentials, intracranial electroencephalogram and polysomnography. Auditory stimuli induced robust and selective spiking and high-gamma (80–200 Hz) power responses across the lateral temporal lobe during both non-rapid eye movement (NREM) and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. Sleep only moderately attenuated response magnitudes, mainly affecting late responses beyond early auditory cortex and entrainment to rapid click-trains in NREM sleep. By contrast, auditory-induced alpha–beta (10–30 Hz) desynchronization (that is, decreased power), prevalent in wakefulness, was strongly reduced in sleep. Thus, extensive auditory responses persist during sleep whereas alpha–beta power decrease, likely reflecting neural feedback processes, is deficient. More broadly, our findings suggest that feedback signaling is key to conscious sensory processing.
Despite extensive knowledge of its molecular and cellular effects, how anesthesia affects sensory processing remains poorly understood. In particular, it remains unclear whether anesthesia modestly or robustly degrades activity in primary sensory regions, and whether such changes are linked to anesthesia drug concentration versus behavioral unresponsiveness, which are typically confounded. Here, we used slow gradual intravenous propofol anesthesia induction together with auditory stimulation and intermittent assessment of behavioral responsiveness while recording epidural electroencephalogram, and neuronal spiking activity in primary auditory cortex (PAC) of eight rats. We found that all main components of neuronal activity including spontaneous firing rates, onset response magnitudes, onset response latencies, postonset neuronal silence duration, late-locking to 40 Hz click-trains, and offset responses, gradually changed in a dose-dependent manner with increasing anesthesia levels without showing abrupt shifts around loss of righting reflex or other time-points. Thus, the dominant factor affecting PAC responses is the anesthesia drug concentration rather than any sudden, dichotomous behavioral state changes. Our findings explain a wide array of seemingly conflicting results in the literature that, depending on the precise definition of wakefulness (vigilant vs. drowsy) and anesthesia (light vs. deep/surgical), report a spectrum of effects in primary regions ranging from minimal to dramatic differences.
Sleep is defined as a reversible, homeostatically-regulated state of a reduced behavioral responsiveness, and a high arousal threshold in response to external sensory stimulation defines sleep across all species. However, it remains unclear whether sleep mainly gates motor output or affects responses along sensory pathways, and if sleep primarily modulates specific aspects of the sensory response such as feedforward vs. feedback signaling. Here, we simultaneously recorded polysomnography, iEEG, microwire LFPs, and neuronal spiking activity in epilepsy patients implanted with clinical depth electrodes, while presenting auditory stimuli (e.g. click-trains, words, music) during wakefulness and sleep. We found robust spiking and induced LFP high-gamma (80-200Hz) power responses during both NREM and REM sleep across the lateral temporal lobe whose magnitude was only moderately attenuated, most notably for late responses beyond early auditory cortex. Nonetheless, sleep responses maintained their tight locking with soundwave envelopes and their information content was minimally affected. By contrast, LFP alpha-beta (10-30Hz) power decrease was prevalent in wakefulness but significantly disrupted in sleep. Entrainment to 40Hz click-trains was comparable across REM sleep and wakefulness but reduced in NREM sleep. Together, our results establish extensive and robust auditory responses during sleep while LFP alpha-beta power decrease, likely reflecting top-down processes, is deficient. More broadly, they point to feedback signalling as key in conscious sensory processing.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.