Objectives: National and international guidelines recommend empiric first-line treatments of individuals infected with Helicobacter pylori without prior antimicrobial susceptibility testing. For this reason, knowledge of primary resistance to first-line antibiotics such as clarithromycin is essential. We assessed the primary resistance of H. pylori in Germany to key antibiotics by molecular genetic methods and evaluated risk factors for the development of resistance. Methods: Gastric tissue samples of 1851 yet treatment-naïve H. pylori-positive patients were examined with real-time PCR or PCR and Sanger sequencing for mutations conferring resistance to clarithromycin, levofloxacin and tetracycline. Clinical and epidemiological data were documented and univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted. Results: Overall primary resistances were 11.3% (210/1851) to clarithromycin, and 13.4% (201/1497) to levofloxacin; resistance to tetracycline (2.5%, 38/1497) was as low as combined resistance to clarithromycin/levofloxacin (2.6%, 39/1497). Female sex and prior antimicrobial therapies owing to unrelated bacterial infections were risk factors for clarithromycin resistance (adjusted OR (aOR) 2.3, 95% CI 1.6e3.4; and 2.6, 95% CI 1.5e4.5, respectively); older age was associated with levofloxacin resistance (aOR for those 65 years compared with those 18e35 years: 6.6, 95% CI 3.1e14.2). Conclusions: Clarithromycin might still be recommended in first-line eradication therapies in yet untreated patients, but as nearly every tenth patient may carry clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori it may be advisable to rule out resistance ahead of treatment by carrying out susceptibility testing or prescribing an alternative therapy.

Eradication success was poor despite susceptibility testing. Gastroenterologists are advised to prescribe recommended salvage treatments, considering recommended dosages and prolonged treatment duration.

Objectives: Infections of the ascitic fluid are serious conditions that require rapid diagnosis and treatment. Ascites is often accompanied by other critical pathologies such as gastrointestinal bleeding and bowel perforation, and infection increases the risk of mortality in intensive care patients. Owing to a relatively low success rate of conventional culture methods in identifying the responsible pathogens, new methods may be helpful to guide antimicrobial therapy and to refine empirical regimens. Here, we aim to assess outcomes and to identify responsible pathogens in ascitic fluid infections, in order to improve patients’ care and to guide empirical therapy. Methods: Between October 2019 and March 2021, we prospectively collected 50 ascitic fluid samples from ICU patients with suspected infection. Beside standard culture-based microbiology methods, excess fluid underwent DNA isolation and was analyzed by next- and third-generation sequencing (NGS) methods. Results: NGS-based methods had higher sensitivity in detecting additional pathogenic bacteria such as E. faecalis and Klebsiella in 33 out of 50 (66%) ascitic fluid samples compared with culture-based methods (26%). Anaerobic bacteria were especially identified by sequencing-based methods in 28 samples (56%), in comparison with only three samples in culture. Analysis of clinical data showed a correlation between sequencing results and various clinical parameters such as peritonitis and hospitalization outcomes. Conclusions: Our results show that, in ascitic fluid infections, NGS-based methods have a higher sensitivity for the identification of clinically relevant pathogens than standard microbiological culture diagnostics, especially in detecting hard-to-culture anaerobic bacteria. Patients with such infections may benefit from the use of NGS methods by the possibility of earlier and better targeted antimicrobial therapy, which has the potential to lower the high morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients with ascitic bacterial infection.