Currently, bladder cancer (BCa) evaluation depends mainly on traditional clinicopathological parameters encompassing tumor stage and grade, which will not reflect the behavior of the disease. Diverse molecular alterations are responsible for the heterogeneous course. The differences in molecular pathogenesis between non-invasive BCa and invasive BCa have been recognized. Molecular biomarkers are promising to predict progression and survival. The management of advanced BCa remains somewhat primitive in comparison with other more common malignancies. This topic will discuss the molecular pathways, biomarkers and potential targets that may improve the outcome in BCa.

Most of the pheochromocytomas (PCCs) are benign neoplasms, but when they are malignant, they can be difficult to treat. Despite advances in diagnosis and imaging, it remains an untreatable tumor, when metastases develop. A deeper understanding of the alteration of the specific molecular pathways causing malignant PCCs might hopefully lead in the future to the development of multiple molecular-targeted therapies to treat it successfully. Clinical experience and the use of murine models of metastatic PCCs have helped introduce new experimental treatment options which will significantly help the PCCs community explore novel targeted therapies that have already shown promising results in many other types of tumors.

In our center; at the end of life, there is a gradual increase in the number of patients receiving chemotherapy which significantly increased cancer patients' odds without clear predictive factors associated with its use, which calls into question the benefits of PCT in terminally ill cancer patients.

This article has been withdrawn at the request of the editor. The authors have plagiarized part of a paper that had already appeared in ASCO EDUCATIONAL BOOK (2014), 91-99 (http://meetinglibrary.asco.org/content/114000091-144). One of the conditions of submission of a paper for publication is that authors declare explicitly that their work is original and has not appeared in a publication elsewhere. Re-use of any data should be appropriately cited. As such this article represents an abuse of the scientific publishing system. The scientific community takes a very strong view on this matter and apologies are offered to readers of the journal that this was not detected during the submission process. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy. This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy).

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) represents one of the most important causes of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. This investigation was undertaken to investigate the natural history of VTE in the oncology center in a tertiary care hospital. We did a retrospective study on cancer patients who presented to King Abdullah Medical city in Holly capital; a tertiary care hospital; from May 2011 to June 2013. Follow up period was calculated from time of VTE diagnosis till the last clinical visit or till patient death. Among 1,678 cancer patients, 132 (7.87 %) were diagnosed with VTE. The median patient age was 53.5 years, with female to male ratio 1.3/1. Thirty one patients (23.5 %) were diagnosed with VTE and cancer simultaneously, seventy four patients (56.1 %) were on chemotherapy and twenty eight patients (21.2 %) were on best supportive care.VTE were symptomatic in 110 patients (83.3 %) and asymptomatic in 22 patients (16.7 %). Lower limbs were the commonest site (42.4 %) with the highest incidence in patients with advanced stages (93 %). Forty nine (37 %) patients were receiving LMWH as prophylaxis. Median survival in months for patients with VTE prophylaxis versus without prophylactic, and asymptomatic versus symptomatic were (12.6 vs 6.3; p 0.12 and 9.8 vs 12.4; p 0.885, respectively). There is underutilization of thromboprophylaxis in our region, which needs more effort to reduce VTE burden. Also we need large prospective studies to clarify the impact of VTE symptoms and presentation on patient's survival.

Abstract:In our center, among 1965 patients registered with malignancies for treatment during the period from May 2011 till December 2013, 3 cases with multiple primary tumors (MPMs) reported, one of them was excluded due to inadequacy of data and we present the remaining two cases. First case was 82 years old female patient with colon cancer and thyroid malignancy, the second case was 61 years old female patient with colon cancer and breast cancer. Both cases were metachronous and discovered accidently during the regular follow up, and managed in curative intent. These cases are being reported to make clinicians aware that individuals with cancer are at increased risk for subsequent cancers, which must be differentiated from recurrent or metastatic disease as the treatment plan will be different.

BMI is dependent on prognostic factors in patients with MPC.

e15570 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is generally associated with poor prognosis. The present study aims to assess potential value of perioperative systemic chemotherapy in patients treated with cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC (CRS/HIPEC) in a single institute in Saudi Arabia. Methods: We included CRC with PC who underwent CRS/ HIPEC from January 2012 till December 2019. Different clinicopathological, treatment-related factors and dates of relapse/death, were retrospectively assessed. We checked the distribution of these factors in addition to survival outcome in those who received perioperative chemotherapy vs. none. Results: We recruited 127 eligible patients (79 patients [62.2%] received systemic chemotherapy). Patients with no perioperative chemotherapy were more likely to have grade 1 tumours (62.5% vs. 25.3%, p < 0.0001), mucinous adenocarcinoma (41.7% vs. 12.7%, p = 0.002), normal CEA ≤5 ng/dl (70.2% vs. 47.4%, p = 0.016) and peritoneal-only metastasis (66.7% vs. 45.6%, p = 0.021). Median PFS and OS were 34 and 62.2 months, respectively. Patients with no perioperative systemic chemotherapy had significantly better PFS and OS (median PFS: not reached vs. 19 months, HR = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.15-0.59, p < 0.0001, OS :HR = 4.3, 95% CI 1.3-14.3, p = 0.009). After adjustment of different prognostic factors, there was no significance difference in OS between the two groups (HR = 3.8, 95% CI = 0.98-14.71, p = 0.053), while PFS was still significantly better in the no chemotherapy group (HR = 2.52, 95% CI = 1.13-5.63, p = 0.024). Conclusions: CRS/HIPEC provided favourable survival outcome in our study cohort especially in patients with more favourable prognostic features. No survival benefit with perioperative chemotherapy could be demonstrated.