BackgroundLiver metastasis is the most common type of lung cancer metastasis, and is a significant prognostic factor in lung cancer. However, the effect of liver metastases on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remains inconsistent and controversial. The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between liver metastases and ICI efficacy in patients with advanced lung cancer based on data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies.MethodsPubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library databases, conference proceedings, as well as grey literature websites were searched for eligible studies without language restrict ion. Study quality was assessed using Cochrane tools and the Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS). Outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The difference in efficacy between patients with and without liver metastases was calculated by pooling ratios of hazard ratios (HR), as calculated using the deft approach.ResultsA total of 16 RCTs and 14 observational trials were included. Analyses of RCTs revealed a survival benefit for ICI treatment (i.e., ICI monotherapy, ICI + Chemotherapy, dual ICI therapy and dual ICI + Chemotherapy) versus standard therapies among non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with liver metastases (PFS HR, 0.77; 95%CI, 0.61–0.97; OS HR, 0.78; 95%CI, 0.68–0.90). NSCLC patients with liver metastases achieved less PFS benefit and comparable OS benefit from ICI treatment compared with those without liver metastases (ratios of PFS–HRs, 1.19; 95%CI, 1.02–1.39; P=0.029; Ratios of OS–HRs, 1.10; 95%CI, 0.94–1.29; P=0.24). For patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC), ICI treatment achieved a marginal effect on patients with liver metastases as compared with standard therapies (OS HR, 0.94; 95%CI, 0.73–1.23). SCLC patients with liver metastases benefited less from ICI treatment than patients without liver metastases (ratio of OS–HRs, 1.22; 95%CI, 1.01–1.46; P=0.036). In real-world data analysis, liver metastasis could be used as an independent prognostic risk factor, increasing the risk of death by 21% in lung cancer patients receiving ICI treatment compared with those without liver metastases (OS HR, 1.21; 95%CI, 1.17–1.27; P<0.0001). Subgroup analysis confirmed that this association was not modified by race (Asian vs. Western) or number of treatment lines.ConclusionsThe presence of liver metastases does not significantly influence the OS benefit of ICIs in patients with NSCLC. However, a small amount of data shows that liver metastasis restrains the magnitude of OS benefit in patients with SCLC. Liver metastasis has potential as an independent prognostic risk factor for lung cancer patients receiving ICI treatment in clinical practice.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier (CRD42022306449).
The application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in non-small cell lung cancer has significantly improved patient survival. However, most patients fail to respond to ICIs or develop drug resistance during treatment. Therefore, novel biomarkers are needed to predict the efficacy of ICIs or provide clues on how to overcome drug resistance. Here, it was revealed that cell division cycle 25C (CDC25C) expression was upregulated in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) compared to that of normal lung tissue in multiple databases. This was further verified by q-PCR. Furthermore, higher CDC25C expression was associated with shorter overall survival and worse pathological stage. Most importantly, a higher CDC25C expression was associated with shorter progression-free survival in LUAD patients treated with nivolumab, suggesting the role of the cell cycle in immunotherapy. In addition, CDC25C expression was significantly associated with immune cell infiltration and immune-related signatures in the LUAD tumor microenvironment. Moreover, CDC25C was differentially expressed and correlated with overall survival in multiple tumors, indicating that CDC25C is a broad-spectrum biomarker. Taken together, our study demonstrates that CDC25C is a prognostic biomarker for LUAD patients, especially for patients treated with ICIs. Our study also provides strong evidence for the role of the cell cycle in ICIs therapy and tumor microenvironment.
The application of chemotherapy in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is limited by the toxicity to normal cells and the development of multi‐drug resistance. Targeted chemotherapy using cytotoxic analogs against specific receptors on cancer cells could be a less toxic and more efficacious approach. We identified that the expressions of somatostatin receptor (SSTR) 2 and 5 in tumor tissues from NSCLC patients were higher than those in the adjacent normal tissues by immunohistochemistry, and therefore, cytotoxic somatostatin analogues might be applied for SSTRs‐mediated targeted therapy against NSCLC. Two cytotoxic analogs, paclitaxel‐octreotide (PTX‐OCT) and 2paclitaxel‐octreotide (2PTX‐OCT), were synthesized by linking one or two molecules of paclitaxel to one molecule of somatostatin analog octreotide. PTX‐OCT and 2PTX‐OCT significantly inhibited the growth and induced apoptosis of SSTR2‐ and SSTR5‐positive A549 cells, compared with the control (p < 0.01), and had less inhibitory effect on SSTR2‐ and SSTR5‐negative H157 cells than paclitaxel (p < 0.01). Moreover, compared with paclitaxel, PTX‐OCT conjugates induced lower expression of MDR‐1 gene both in vitro and in vivo. Three A549 paclitaxel‐resistant cell lines were established through different approaches, and the paclitaxel‐resistant cell showed higher sensitivity to PTX‐OCT conjugates than to paclitaxel, which might be because of the differential MDR‐related gene expressions and cell‐cycle distribution in paclitaxel‐resistant A549 cells. Our results suggested that PTX‐OCT conjugates could be potentially used for SSTRs‐mediated targeted therapy for NSCLC, especially for those with paclitaxel resistance and induced less multidrug resistance.
BackgroundThe emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has significantly improved the clinical outcomes of patients with metastatic melanoma. However, survival benefits are only observed in a subset of patients. The fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) family genes are frequently mutated in melanoma, yet their impacts on the efficacy of ICIs remain unclear. Our study aimed to explore the association of FGFR mutations with ICIs efficacy in metastatic melanoma.MethodsThe Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data (PanCancer Atlas, skin cutaneous melanoma (SKCM), n = 448) in cBioPortal were collected as a TCGA cohort to investigate the association between FGFR mutations and prognosis of melanoma patients. To explore the impact of FGFR mutations on the efficacy of ICIs in melanoma, clinical and tumor whole-exome sequencing (WES) data of four ICI-treated studies from cBioPortal were consolidated as an ICIs-treated cohort. Moreover, the relationship between FGFR mutations and immunogenicity (tumor mutation burden (TMB), neo-antigen load (NAL), mismatch repair (MMR)-related genes and DNA damage repair (DDR)-related genes) of melanoma was evaluated utilizing data from the ICIs-treated cohort. The influence of FGFR mutations on the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) of melanoma was also analyzed using the TCGA cohort.ResultsIn the TCGA cohort, survival in melanoma patients with or without FGFR mutations was nearly equivalent. In the ICIs-treated cohort, patients with FGFR mutations had better survival than those without (median overall survival: 60.00 vs. 31.00 months; hazard ratio: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.42-0.80; P = 0.0051). Besides, the objective response rate was higher for patients harboring FGFR mutations (55.56%) compared to wild-type patients (22.40%) (P = 0.0076). Mechanistically, it was revealed that FGFR mutations correlated with increased immunogenicity (e.g., TMB, NAL, MMR-related gene mutations and DDR-related gene mutations). Meanwhile, FGFR mutant melanoma tended to exhibit an enhanced antitumor TIME compared with its wild-type counterparts.ConclusionsOur study demonstrated that FGFR mutations is a promising biomarker in stratifying patients with advanced melanoma who might benefit from ICIs therapy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.