The self-compacting concrete (SCC) mix design is much more complex than that of ordinary concrete. Increased testing on fresh concrete and a substantial volume of materials is consequently needed. The concrete equivalent mortar (CEM) method proposes an approach that simplifies and speeds up the experimental testing programmes. This paper seeks to establish the relationships between the rheological properties of SCC and the corresponding CEM mixes. Another aim is to validate the unconventional tools used to test the flow properties of CEM relative to the procedures applied for SCC. Different series of SCC and CEM mixes, based on natural and recycled aggregates, with various superplasticizer contents were tested. The flow behaviour of SCC was tested in line with procedures recommended by EFNARC; that of self-compacting concrete equivalent mortar (SC-CEM) was carried out with unconventional tools (mini-slump cone, slump flow time T 250 , mini L-Box, 2.5-mm sieve, and mini LCPC Box), described in detail in this paper. A rheometer equipped with vane geometry was also used to show the close relationship between SCC and the SC-CEM yield stress. The experimental results indicate that the fresh properties of the mixture series are congruent with the acceptance criteria of SCC, but they are affected when increasing the superplasticizer dosage and further impacted when recycled coarse aggregates (RCAs) replace natural coarse aggregates (NCAs). The slump flow test appears to be a good practical means for predicting the yield stress of SC-CEM. The cross-referencing results reveal significant relationships between SCC and the corresponding SC-CEM, particularly for filling ability and passing properties. Reasonable correlation coefficients from 0.70 to 0.85 were found.Keywords Recycled concrete aggregates • Concrete equivalent mortar • Self-compacting concrete • Fresh properties
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.