Objective To assess the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in initial staging of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and its impact on changing the management compared to other conventional methods. Patients and methods A prospective study of 31 patients (21 male and 10 female), mean age 49.3 ± 12.1 years with histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (nasopharynx was the commonest cancer in 15 patients (48.4%), poorly differentiated grade represented 64.5% of all tumors. Initial staging was achieved according to routine physical examination, endoscopy, CT, U/S, MRI. Results The overall change in TNM staging by 18F-FDG PET/CT in relation to conventional methods was encountered in 15/31 patients (48.4%). PET/CT changed; T staging in three patients (9.6%), upstaging in two patients and downstaging in one patient. PET/CT upstaged all 13/31 patients in N staging (41.9%). 18F-FDG PET/CT changed; M staging in 3/31 (9.6%) patients, upstaging in two and downstaging in one patient. PET/CT results caused radiotherapy modification in 21/31 patients (67.7%). PET/CT detected intra-parotid nodule in four patients, so additional radiation was added to the parotid in the treatment field. Retropharyngeal nodes were detected by PET/CT in three patients that were missed by conventional imaging. 18F-FDG PET/CT detected two patients of thyroid papillary carcinoma and one case of sigmoid neoplasm confirmed by histopathology. Conclusion 18F-FDG-PET/CT is considered a valuable diagnostic test in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma at initial assessment which would change staging and radiotherapy planning and hence proper management.
Background: Despite the benefits of postoperative radiotherapy for gastric cancer patients after publishing the results of the Intergroup 0116 (INT-0116) study, there are still the concerns of radiation-induced toxicity. Aim: To determine the radiation technique that can eliminate the dose of radiation to the organ at risk (OAR) in patients postoperatively treated for gastric cancer with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) or intensitymodulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using dosimetric analysis. Methods: A total of 22 computerized radiation plans were reviewed. Dosimetric values for 3DCRT and IMRT technique were calculated. The following dosimetric parameters were compared for the planned target volume (PTV); the homogeneity index, maximal and minimal doses, the volumes of PTV received 95 % and 107 % of the prescribed dose. In addition, the mean dose and dose volume histogram (DVH) for the OAR as, V20 for each kidney, V30 for the liver, maximum dose (Dmax) for D1% of the spinal cord and V40 to the heart . Results: The 3D-CRT and IMRT achieved comparable PTV coverage. However, IMRT was associated with a highly significant decrease in the mean V20 value of the right kidney by 15% (P=0.001) and left kidney by 9% (P=0.01). The IMRT significantly improved sparing of the mean irradiated volume and the V30 of the liver by 12% (P=0.01) and by 10% (P=0.02) respectively compared with 3D-CRT. On the other hand, the dosimetric parameters for the spinal cord and heart were comparable for the IMRT and 3D-CRT plans. Conclusion: In gastric cancer patients receiving postoperative radiotherapy, IMRT provided better protection for the liver and kidneys when compared to 3D-CRT.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.