AimsTo compare two different clopidogrel regimens on the outcomes of patients undergoing elective coronary angiography (CAG)±ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Methods and resultsOpen-trial randomized 1028 patients with stable angina to group A (‘non-selective’—clopidogrel 600 mg >6 h before CAG; n = 513) or group B (‘selective’—clopidogrel 600 mg in the cath-lab after CAG, only in case of PCI; n = 515). Combined primary endpoint was death/periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI)/stroke/re-intervention within 7 days. Secondary endpoints were troponin elevation and bleeding complications. Primary endpoint occurred in 0.8% group A patients vs. 1% group B (P = 0.749; 90% CI for the percentage difference −1.2–0.8). Periprocedural troponin elevation (>3× ULN) was detected in 2.6% group A vs. 3.3% group B (P = 0.475; 90% CI −2.5–1.0). Bleeding complications occurred in 3.5% group A patients vs. 1.4% group B (P = 0.025). After adjustment for covariates and factors that may influence the bleeding risk, patients in group A were shown to have more likely bleeding complications when compared with group B (OR = 3.03; 95% CI 1.14–8.10; P = 0.027).ConclusionHigh (600 mg) loading dose of clopidogrel before elective CAG increased the risk of minor bleeding complications, while the benefit on periprocedural infarction was not significant. Clopidogrel can be given safely in the catheterization laboratory between CAG and PCI in chronic stable angina patients.
IVUS showed diffuse hypoechogenic plaques in patients with FD. The explanation may be higher lipid content in plaques and accumulation of glycosphingolipid in smooth-muscle and endothelial cells.
Objective and background: Despite the use of reperfusion therapies, outcomes in patients with large myocardial infarction (MI), late reperfusion and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction are poor. We investigated long-term safety and effi cacy of intracoronary injections of autologous bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells (BMNCs). Methods: 27 patients with anterior MI (age 59±12 years, mean baseline LV ejection fraction (LVEF) 39±5 %), who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention 4-24 hours after the onset of symptoms, were randomly assigned either to intracoronary BMNCs injection (n=17, BMNCs group, out of which 14 underwent long-term follow-up), or to standard therapy (n=10, Control group). The LVEF, the LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes (LVEDV, LVESV) were assessed by echocardiography at discharge, Month 4 and 24. Myocardial perfusion was assessed using SPECT at baseline and Month 4. Results: At 24-month, there was no difference in rates of serious clinical events (36 % vs 50 %, p=0.54). At Month 4 LVEF improved to similar extent in both groups (absolute change +5.8 % vs +7.6 %, p=0.75), with similar infarct size reductions (-10.9 % vs-12.2 %, p=0.47). However, at Month 24, LVEF further improved in BMNCs patients (+12 % vs +8.5 %, p=0.03). This effect resulted from a more pronounced reduction in LVESV (-2.6 ml vs-1.8 ml, p=0.26) and a smaller increase in LVEDV (+16.7 ml vs +17.9 ml, p=0.27) suggesting benefi cial long-term effects on LV remodeling. Conclusions: BMNCs injections in patients with MI and LV dysfunction were associated with a signifi cant improvement of global LVEF during long term follow-up compared to standard therapy (Tab. 3, Fig. 1, Ref. 50).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.