Background As COVID-19 has been declared as a pandemic disease by the WHO on March 11th, 2020, the global incidence of COVID-19 disease increased dramatically. In response to the COVID-19 situation, Jordan announced the emergency state on the 19th of March, followed by the curfew on 21 March. All educational institutions have been closed as well as educational activities including clinical medical education have been suspended on the 15th of March. As a result, Distance E-learning emerged as a new method of teaching to maintain the continuity of medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic related closure of educational institutions. Distance E-Learning is defined as using computer technology to deliver training, including technology-supported learning either online, offline, or both. Before this period, distance learning was not considered in Jordanian universities as a modality for education. This study aims to explore the situation of distance E-learning among medical students during their clinical years and to identify possible challenges, limitations, satisfaction as well as perspectives for this approach to learning. Methods This cross-sectional study is based on a questionnaire that was designed and delivered to medical students in their clinical years. For this study, the estimated sample size (n = 588) is derived from the online Raosoft sample size calculator. Results A total of 652 students have completed the questionnaire, among them, 538 students (82.5%) have participated in distance learning in their medical schools amid COVID-19 pandemic. The overall satisfaction rate in medical distance learning was 26.8%, and it was significantly higher in students with previous experience in distance learning in their medical schools as well as when instructors were actively participating in learning sessions, using multimedia and devoting adequate time for their sessions. The delivery of educational material using synchronous live streaming sessions represented the major modality of teaching and Internet streaming quality and coverage was the main challenge that was reported by 69.1% of students. Conclusion With advances in technologies and social media, distance learning is a new and rapidly growing approach for undergraduate, postgraduate, and health care providers. It may represent an optimal solution to maintain learning processes in exceptional and emergency situations such as COVID-19 pandemic. Technical and infrastructural resources reported as a major challenge for implementing distance learning, so understanding technological, financial, institutional, educators, and student barriers are essential for the successful implementation of distance learning in medical education.

No abstract

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.

No abstract

Introduction Spontaneous perforation of the colon (SPC) is a rare disease characterized by sudden perforation of a clinically healthy colon in the absence of underlying disease or trauma. The aim of reporting this case is to highlight this surgical emergency in terms of clinical presentations, surgical management and outcomes. Presentation of case A 68 year-old male with history of diabetes mellitus, hypertension and chronic constipation on daily laxatives presented to the emergency department with a diffuse abdominal pain and distention for 4 days associated with vomiting and absence of defecation where he was prescribed phosphate rectal enemas. Patient was in sepsis with generalized abdominal tenderness and distention. Intraoperative findings of feculent peritonitis with isolated cecal perforation was identified, for which a right hemicolectomy with end ileostomy was performed. Discussion The first case was described in a woman presented with spontaneous rectum rupture by Brodie in 1827, with a less than 100 cases being reported in literature. In 1984, spontaneous perforations were classified into either “stercoral” or “idiopathic” perforations. More than 60% of colonic perforations were reported in the sigmoid or at the recto-sigmoid junction, mainly at the anti-mesenteric border, making spontaneous cecal perforation a very uncommon condition. Cecal perforation is associated with high mortality in the range of 30%–72%. Conclusion The outcome of SPC depends on multiple factors like onset of perforation, peritoneal contamination, and time of intervention. Regardless the surgical technique, early detection and surgical management are the main strategies associated with improving the outcomes.