The coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has disproportionately impacted lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer (LGBTQ+) people. Despite developing safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines, LGBTQ+ communities still faces challenges due to inequitable access and vaccine hesitancy. Vaccine hesitancy is a delay in the acceptance or refusal of vaccines despite the availability of vaccination services. Various studies have explored and tried to address factors influencing vaccine hesitancy. However, the LGBTQ+ population remains under- and misrepresented in many of these studies. According to the few studies that have focused on the LGBTQ+ population, several factors influencing vaccine hesitancy have been identified, with the most common factors in studies being concern about vaccine safety, vaccine efficacy, and history of bad experiences with healthcare providers. In order to rebuild the confidence of LGBTQ+ people in vaccines, governments, healthcare policymakers, and healthcare providers need to start by acknowledging, and then resolving, these disparities; building trust; dismantling systemic suppression and discrimination; and prioritizing the inclusion of LGBTQ+ people in research studies and public health policies.

The management of vomiting and antiemetic therapy in young children with acute gastroenteritis (AGE) has not been standardized by any management guidelines. Antiemetic drugs including promethazine, prochlorperazine, metoclopramide, ondansetron, and domperidone are readily used in the emergency departments (EDs). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of ondansetron with domperidone in cessation of vomiting in pediatric AGE. Methods This open-label, two-arm trial was conducted in a pediatric ED in Pakistan. Children of age 1 to 60 months presenting with acute vomiting and no or mild-to-moderate dehydration associated with AGE were randomized into two groups. Group A children received ondansetron suspension orally at a dose of 0.15 mg/kg body weight. Group B received domperidone suspension orally at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg body weight. The primary outcome was the number of children in each group who did not have any episode of vomiting 24 hours posttreatment. The data were entered and analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows version 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results At 6 hours, 87% of children in the ondansetron group improved and their vomiting episodes ceased as compared to 81% of children in the domperidone group. The differences were statistically insignificant (p>0.05). At 24 hours, 95% in the ondansetron group had improved and only 85% in the domperidone group. The results were statistically significant favoring the end results of the ondansetron (p=0.01). Conclusions This study concluded that ondansetron is more efficacious than domperidone in cessation of vomiting associated with AGE and no or mild-to-moderate dehydration in children of age three months to five years.

Introduction The emergence and continuous spread of drug resistant bacteria has become one of the leading health concerns globally. Persistent failure to develop and/or discover new antibiotics along with irrational use of existing antibiotics is associated with rise in antibiotic resistance. There is poor understanding of antibiotics usage and their preciousness among the masses which result in careless utilization and hence, the emerging antibiotic resistance. The aim of this study is to evaluate the knowledge and attitude of Pakistanis towards antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Methods This observational cross-sectional survey was designed in the form of an online pro forma circulated in January 2019. It was a self-structured pro forma which included age, gender, and 10 questions - five to assess the knowledge and five to assess the attitude towards AMR. Each question was to be responded with a “Yes” or a “No.” For knowledge assessing questions “do not know” was also an option. Data was entered and analysed using SPSS version 22 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results Of 1,132 participants, 837 (73.9%) thought that it was alright to stop antibiotics course whenever they felt better, 505 (44.6%) thought that frequent and unnecessary use of antibiotics actually decrease their effectiveness, and 208 (18.4%) participants thought it was correct to take antibiotics for cold and influenza. There were 157 (13.9%) participants who had not followed the duration of treatment as given in their doctor’s prescription, 49 (4.4%) who had changed their antibiotic dose without doctor consultation, 467 (41.3%) who had reused leftover antibiotics from their previous prescription, 700 (61.8%) who had suggested it to their doctors to prescribe them antibiotics and 378 (33.4%) participants who had purchased antibiotics without any prescription in the last one year. Conclusion Pakistani individuals are not as knowledgeable about antibiotic resistance as severe the issue is in this region. Their attitude towards utilization of antibiotics is not very promising. It becomes essential to initiate antibiotic stewardship programs and educate the masses regarding efficacious and safe use of antibiotics in this region.

This paper presents the observation of four-top-quark ($$t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$$ t t ¯ t t ¯ ) production in proton-proton collisions at the LHC. The analysis is performed using an integrated luminosity of 140 $$\hbox {fb}^{-1}$$ fb - 1 at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV collected using the ATLAS detector. Events containing two leptons with the same electric charge or at least three leptons (electrons or muons) are selected. Event kinematics are used to separate signal from background through a multivariate discriminant, and dedicated control regions are used to constrain the dominant backgrounds. The observed (expected) significance of the measured $$t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$$ t t ¯ t t ¯ signal with respect to the standard model (SM) background-only hypothesis is 6.1 (4.3) standard deviations. The $$t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$$ t t ¯ t t ¯ production cross section is measured to be $$22.5^{+6.6}_{-5.5}$$ 22 . 5 - 5.5 + 6.6  fb, consistent with the SM prediction of $$12.0 \pm 2.4$$ 12.0 ± 2.4 fb within 1.8 standard deviations. Data are also used to set limits on the three-top-quark production cross section, being an irreducible background not measured previously, and to constrain the top-Higgs Yukawa coupling and effective field theory operator coefficients that affect $$t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$$ t t ¯ t t ¯ production.

Introduction Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) induced cough is still the greatest challenge in the continued utilization of ACEi for management of hypertension. The clinical pattern and related risk factors predisposing patients to ACEi-induced cough have not been studied in Pakistani hypertensive patients as yet. Hence, this study was conducted. Methods In this prospective, observational study individuals of both genders, of age 18 years or more, known cases of hypertension, taking ACEi, and having a chronic cough (>14 days) without any respiratory etiology were included. Their demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded. All data were managed using SPSS for Windows version 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results Enalapril was the most frequently prescribed ACEi (n=58; 47.2%) in patients with ACEi-induced cough followed by captopril (n=28; 22.7%), lisinopril (n=23; 18.7%), and ramipril (n=14; 11.4%). Higher body mass index (p=0.002), smoking (p=0.008), and longer time from the start of ACEi to the occurrence of cough (p=0.04) were the significant determinants of ACEi-induced cough. There were 33 (26.8%) participants who planned to request their physician to prescribe them an alternate medication due to their cough. Conclusions Enalapril was the most commonly ACEi prescribed among patients with ACEi-induced cough. Higher BMI, smoking, and longer time from the start of ACEi to the occurrence of cough related to ACEi-induced cough.

Introduction Acute liver failure is a cause of major mortality in the United States. Although the liver possesses regenerative capabilities, liver transplantation is the mainstay of treating acute liver failure. This modality is associated with many financial and logistic challenges. In this regard, Extracorporeal Liver Support (ECLS) might help in reducing mortality as well as bridge a patient to liver transplant. In some cases, the sequelae of liver failure such as hepatic encephalopathy and multi-organ failure can be postponed long enough for the native liver to self-recover function. With this rationale, we sought to describe the mechanism of various ECLS modalities, provide an overview of the current evidence regarding its use and to highlight future advancements that could overcome hindrances in its use. Methods A scoping review was performed using PubMed and other databases from 1990 to 2020 with the keywords: ‘extracorporeal liver support’, ‘acute liver failure’, ‘acute on chronic liver failure’, ‘albumin dialysis’, ‘artificial’ and ‘bioartificial’. Results and conclusions ECLS has shown significant improvements in bilirubin and urea levels. Various forms of ECLS might also reduce mortality due to liver failure. However, many complications, such as hypotension, anemia, bleeding issues, sepsis, can be anticipated. There are a few barriers to mainstream use of ECLS, such as specific design requirements and high cost that reduce the overall utility of this modality in a small group of liver transplant candidates. Furthermore, a multidisciplinary team approach is required to supervise ECLS, a luxury only available at major academic hospitals. Some advancements for overcoming these barriers include investigation of new scaffolding systems. In order to expand the usage of ECLS, clinical trials focusing on a comparison of different modalities of ECLS with renal replacement therapy in patients with liver failure should be promoted.

Delirium leading to agitation is a common issue in elderly people and patients with underlying neurocognitive impairment. Despite use of medications to treat agitation, polypharmacy is a major concern and might lead to multiple side effects in this patient population. Therefore, it is imperative to investigate non-pharmacological methods that can provide solutions to the problem. The objective of this review was to evaluate the impact of pet-assisted therapy on elderly patients, with a major focus on agitation and delirium. For the purposes of this study, a scoping review was performed using PubMed, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials. We reviewed literature from 1980 to 2021. Out of the 31 studies reviewed, 14 commented on agitation with respect to pet-assisted interventions. Of these, eight studies (57%) reported a statistically significant reduction in agitation and/or delirium in patients who were exposed to pet therapy. Pet-assisted therapy can improve the standardized care in hospital-based settings for patients with neurocognitive impairment because of better companionship, reduced agitation and mood disorders, and better stability of hemodynamic status. These interventions can pave the way for better patient and hospital satisfaction.

BackgroundThere is limited insight into the epidemiological characteristics and effect of race and ethnicity on Primary Malignant Cardiac Tumors (PMCTs).ObjectivesComparison of clinical characteristics and cancer-specific survival outcomes of major races in the United States from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End-Result (SEER) registry.MethodsICD-O-3 codes were used to identify PMCTs for the years 1975 to 2015. Three major races were identified—“White”, “Black”, and “Asian/Pacific Islander”. Cancer-specific survival outcomes were compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis across and amongst races, based on tumor histology. A subgroup analysis of cancer-specific survival was performed between “Hispanics” and “non-Hispanics.”ResultsSeven hundred and twenty patients were identified−47% females and 79% White, mean age at diagnosis (47 ± 20 years). Black patients were significantly younger (39 ± 18 years) and presented more commonly with angiosarcomas (53%). Non-angiogenic sarcomas and lymphomas were the most common tumors in the White (38%) and Asian/Pacific Islander (34%) cohorts. For a median follow-up period of 50 (IQR3-86) months, cancer-specific survival (mean ± SD, in months) was worse in Blacks (9 ± 3) as compared to Whites (15 ± 1) and Asian/Pacific Islander (14 ± 1) (p-value; Black vs. White <0.001; Black vs. Asian/Pacific Islanders = 0.017, White vs. Asian/Pacific Islanders = 0.3). Subgroup analysis with 116 (16%) Hispanics (40% females; mean age of 40 ± 20 years) showed a longer mean cancer-specific survival of 16.9 ± 2.4 months as compared to 13.6 ± 1.1 months in non-Hispanics (p = 0.011).ConclusionBlack and non-Hispanic patients have poorer cancer-specific survival in PMCTs.