No abstract

No abstract

Among food-borne pathogens, some strains could be resistant to hydrostatic pressure treatment. This information is necessary to establish processing parameters to ensure safety of pressure-pasteurized foods (N. Kalchayanand, A. Sikes, C. P. Dunne, and B. Ray, J. Food Prot. 61:425–431, 1998). We studied variation in pressure resistance among strains of Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus,Escherichia coli O157:H7, and Salmonellaspecies at two temperatures of pressurization. Early-stationary-phase cells in 1% peptone solution were pressurized at 345 MPa either for 5 min at 25°C or for 5, 10, or 15 min at 50°C. The viability loss (in log cycles) following pressurization at 25°C ranged from 0.9 to 3.5 among nine L. monocytogenes strains, 0.7 to 7.8 among sevenS. aureus strains, 2.8 to 5.6 among six E. coliO157:H7 strains, and 5.5 to 8.3 among six Salmonellastrains. The results show that at 25°C some strains of each species are more resistant to pressure than the others. However, when one resistant and one sensitive strain from each species were pressurized at 345 MPa and 50°C, the population of all except the resistantS. aureus strain was reduced by more than 8 log cycles within 5 min. Viability loss of the resistant S. aureusstrain was 6.3 log cycles even after 15 min of pressurization. This shows that strains of food-borne pathogens differ in resistance to hydrostatic pressure (345 MPa) at 25°C, but this difference is greatly reduced at 50°C. Pressurization at 50°C, in place of 25°C, will ensure greater safety of foods.

No abstract

Bacteria are expected to be injured or killed by high hydrostatic pressure (HHP). This depends on pressure levels, species and strain of the microorganism and subsequent storage. Injured bacteria may be repaired which could affect the microbiological quality of foodstuffs with an important safety consideration especially in low acid food products. In this study two Gram-positive (Listeria monocytogenes CA and Staphylococcus aureus 485) and two Gram-negative (Escherichia coli O157:H7 933 and Salmonella enteritidis FDA) relatively pressure resistant strains of foodborne pathogens were pressurized at 350, 450 and 550 MPa in milk (pH 6.65) and stored at 4, 22 and 30 degrees C. The results of shelf life studies indicated two types of injury, I1 and I2, for all the pathogens studied. It is obvious that I2 type injury is a major injury and after its repair (I2 to I1), the cells can form colonies on non-selective but not on selective agar. The formation of colonies on both selective and non-selective agar occurs only after full recovery of injury (I1 to AC). The results presented in this study show that even if injured cells are not detected immediately after HHP treatment, I2 type injury could be potentially present in the food system. Therefore, it is imperative that shelf life studies must be conducted over a period of time for potential repair of I2 type injury either to detectable injury (I1) or to active cells (AC) to ascertain microbiological safety of low acid food products.

Every year millions of people are affected and thousands of them die due to infections and intoxication as a result of foodborne outbreaks, which also cause billions of dollars' worth of damage, public health problems, and agricultural product loss. A considerable portion of these outbreaks is related to fresh produce and caused by foodborne pathogens on fresh produce and mycotoxins. Escherichia coli O104:H4 outbreak, occurred in Germany in 2011, has attracted a great attention on foodborne outbreaks caused by contaminated fresh produce, and especially the vulnerability and gaps in the early warning and notification networks in the surveillance systems in all around the world. In the frame of this paper, we reviewed the most common foodborne pathogens on fresh produce, traceback investigations of the outbreaks caused by these pathogens, and lastly international early warning and notification systems, including PulseNet International and Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed, aiming to detect foodborne outbreaks.

The application of high hydrostatic pressure (HHP) (250 MPa, 35• C for 15 min) and thermal treatment (80• C for 1 min) reduced the microbial load of carrot and tomato juices to undetectable levels. Different combinations of HHP did not cause a significant change in the ascorbic acid content of either juice (P > 0.05). Both heat treatments (60• C for 5-15 min and 80• C for 1 min) resulted in a significant loss (P < 0.05) in the free-radical scavenging activity as compared to untreated samples. HHP-treated juices showed a small loss of antioxidants (below 10%) during storage. The ascorbic acid content of pressurized tomato and carrot juices remained over 70 and 45% after 30 days of storage, respectively. However, heat treatment caused a rapid decrease to 16-20%. Colour changes were minor ( E = 10) for pressurised juices but for heat-pasteurised samples it was more intense and higher as a result of insufficient antioxidant activity. HHP treatment (250 MPa, 35• C for 15 min) led to a better product with regard to anti-radical scavenging capacity, ascorbic acid content and sensory properties (colour, pH) of the tomato and carrot juices compared to conventional pasteurisation. Therefore, HHP can be recommended not only for industrial production but also for safe storage of fresh juices, such as tomato and carrot, even at elevated storage temperatures (25 • C).

No abstract