Background: This study compared radiographic outcomes of pediatric patients undergoing closed reduction of 100% displaced distal radius fractures to a historical, published cohort treated with casting alone. We also examined the expense associated with sedated reduction. Methods: Single-center, retrospective cohort study examining radiographic outcomes following reduction of 100% translated distal radius fractures in 50 consecutive pediatric patients. Radiographic outcomes were compared with a historical cohort published by Crawford and colleagues. Charges associated with emergency department (ED) and clinic visits were compared between the reduction cohort and a comparison cohort of 13 patients with fractures not requiring reduction. Results: Forty-nine children (mean age 4.7 y) were included in this study. Duration of casting averaged 51 days and ED visit duration was 6.6±2.5 hours. Mean sagittal and coronal angulation at time of injury were 16.4 and 15.6 degrees, respectively, and were 13.2 and 9.4 degrees at the time of final follow-up. All fractures achieved radiographic union. Eighteen patients underwent a total of 21 unexpected cast changes. No patients required repeat sedation or surgical management. Angulation after casting was significantly better in the reduction cohort compared with the casting-only cohort initially, however, at final follow-up, both coronal and sagittal angulation were significantly worse in the reduction cohort compared with the casting-only cohort (coronal angulation 8.59 vs. 0.75, P<0.0001; sagittal angulation 13.49 vs. 2.2, P<0.0001). Charge analysis compared 46 patients in the reduction cohort to 13 patients with unreduced fractures from the same institution during the same time period. Mean clinic charges were similar ($1957 vs. $2240, P=0.3008). ED charges were higher in the reduction cohort compared with the nonreduction cohort ($7331 vs. $3501, P<0.001), resulting in higher total charges in the reduction cohort ($9245.04 vs. $5740.99, P<0.001). Conclusions: While closed reduction of 100% translated distal radius fractures in the pediatric population improves angulation initially, casting alone may provide similar or better radiographic outcomes, expedited care, reduced patient exposure to the risks of procedural sedation, and avoidance of ED charges associated with procedural sedation. Level of Evidence: Level III—therapeutic.
Objectives: To compare the stability of screw fixation with that of plate fixation for symphyseal injuries in a vertically unstable pelvic injury (AO/Tile 61-C1) associated with complete disruption of the sacroiliac joint and the pubic symphysis.Methods: Eight fourth-generation composite pelvis models with sacroiliac and pubic symphyseal disruption (Sawbones, Vashon Island, WA) underwent biomechanical testing simulating static single-leg stance. Four were fixed anteriorly with a symphyseal screw, and 4 with a symphyseal plate. All had single transsacral screw fixation posteriorly. Displacement and rotation were monitored at both sacroiliac joint and pubic symphysis.Results: There was no significant difference between the 2 groups for mean maximum force generated. There was no significant difference in net displacement at both sacroiliac joint and pubic symphysis. There was significantly less rotation but more displacement in the screw group in the Z-axis. The screw group showed increased stiffness compared with the plate group.Conclusions: This is the first biomechanical study to compare screw versus plate symphyseal fixation in a Tile C model. Our biomechanical model using anterior and posterior fixation demonstrates that symphyseal screws may be a viable alternative to classically described symphyseal plating.
Objectives: OTA/AO 61C pelvic ring injuries are vertically unstable because of complete sacral fractures combined with anterior ring injury. The objective of this study was to compare the biomechanical characteristics of 4 transsacral screw constructs for posterior pelvic ring fixation, including one that uses a novel fixation method with a pair of locked washers with interdigitating cams.Methods: Type C pelvic ring disruptions were created on 16 synthetic pelvis models. Each pelvis was fixated with an S2 screw in addition to being allocated to 1 of 4 transsacral constructs through S1: (1) 8.0-mm screw, (2) 8.0-mm bolt, (3) 8.0-mm screw locked with a nut, and (4) 8.00-mm screw locked with a nut with the addition of interdigitating washers between the screw head and ilium on the near cortex, and ilium and nut on the far cortex. The anterior ring fractures were not stabilized. Each pelvis underwent 100,000 cycles at 250 N and was then loaded to failure using a unilateral stance testing model. The anterior and posterior osteotomy sites were instrumented with pairs of infrared (IR) light-emitting markers, and the relative displacement of the markers was monitored using a three-dimensional (3D) motion capture system. Displacement measurements at 25,000; 50,000; 75,000; and 100,000 cycles and failure force were recorded for each pelvis. Results:The novel washer design construct performed better than the screw construct with less posterior ring motion at 75,000 (P = 0.029) and 100,000 cycles (P = 0.029). Conclusions:The novel interdigitating washer design may be superior to using a screw construct alone to achieve rigid, locked posterior ring fixation in a synthetic pelvis model with a Type C pelvic ring disruption.
Category: Hindfoot, Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: Cavovarus foot alignment has been significantly associated with increased rates of chronic ankle instability and osteochondral lesions of the talus. Clinical wisdom suggests that cavovarus foot alignment causes varus stress to the ankle and also predisposes individuals to peroneal tendon pathology. However, no studies have specifically explored this relationship. The purpose of this research is to investigate the association between foot alignment and peroneal tendon pathology. Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted of all adult patients in whom a magnetic resonance image (MRI) of the ankle was obtained for any reason at a single institution from 2015-2017. Patients were excluded if they had a charcot foot deformity or if they had undergone prior peroneal tendon, ankle, or hindfoot surgery. Arch alignment was evaluated on lateral weightbearing radiographs of the foot by measuring the adjusted navicular height. Hindfoot alignment was assessed using the Saltzman apparent moment arm method. Peroneal tendon pathology including tears, tendinosis, and tenosynovitis was documented by a fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologist using the MRI scan. All numerical variables were converted to categorical variables (e.g. varus, valgus, and normal alignment). Chi-square testing was utilized to determine the association between variables. Results: 195 patients were included in the study (average age 47 years, 61% female). Patients with hindfoot varus had significantly higher rates of peroneus longus (PL) and peroneus brevis (PB) tendon pathology than patients with neutral or valgus alignment (Figure 1 A, B)(PL 39% vs. 31% vs. 20%, p=0.01; PB 44% vs 27% vs. 27%, p=0.04). Patients with pes cavus demonstrated extremely high rates of peroneal tendon pathology, which was significantly higher than patients with neutral or pes planus alignment (Figure 1 C, D)(PL 71% vs. 28% vs. 9%, p<0.0001; PB 75% vs 30% vs. 26%, p<0.0001). Amongst patients with peroneal tendon pathology, there was no difference in the rates of symptomatic vs. asymptomatic findings based on hindfoot or pes alignment. Conclusion: This is the first study to demonstrate a statistically significant association between cavus foot alignment, hindfoot varus alignment, and peroneal tendon pathology. Interestingly, this study demonstrates that patients with cavovarus alignment are not more likely to be symptomatic than patients with normal and planovalgus alignment. This study also reinforces the idea that peroneal pathology found on MRI may not necessarily need surgery, as it is frequently seen in patients without symptoms. This information may be useful in counseling patients considering operative treatment for peroneal tendon pathology and alignment abnormalities.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.