PurposeThe quality of the opinion provided by audit firms is an important determinant of their long‐term survival, but audit quality is difficult to gauge, which makes it particularly sensitive to the behaviour of the individuals who carry on audit work. This paper seeks to identify the incidence of dysfunctional audit behaviours and audit quality reduction behaviours, actions taken by an auditor during engagement that reduce evidence‐gathering effectiveness.Design/methodology/approachThe paper is based on a survey of 244 auditors working in small/medium and big audit firms in Malaysia.FindingsThe paper identifies key variables leading to dysfunctional audit behaviour.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper is subject to the normal limitations associated with survey research.Practical implicationsThe paper provides basic empirical evidence of a potentially serious risk of dysfunctional behaviours that may impair audit quality.Originality/valueThe paper provides empirical evidence to address the concerns of the Malaysian regulatory authorities regarding audit quality.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.