Expression of CEACAM1 was an independent prognostic factor in our patient population and can be used to stratify patients with adenocarcinomas of the lung into low-risk and high-risk groups. In contrast, the expression of sialyl Lewis X was of no prognostic relevance because it was expressed in 97% of all investigated tumors, and most likely has no influence on the function of CEACAM1 in this tumor entity.
The worldwide incidence of adenocarcinoma of the lung is rising. Unfortunately, no significant prognostic marker beyond the classical TNM staging exists to stratify these patients for appropriate therapy. Because lectins, carbohydrate-binding proteins, have been shown to be useful prognostic markers in several other adenocarcinomas, a panel of lectins [Helix pomatia agglutinin (HPA), Phaseolus vulgaris leukoagglutinin, Ulex europaeus agglutinin, Maackia amurenis agglutinin, Sambucus nigra agglutinin] with different carbohydrate-binding specificities were tested for their prognostic relevance. Paraffin wax sections of 93 patients with adenocarcinomas of the lung who had undergone surgery between 1990 and 1995 were investigated by lectin histochemistry. Lectin-binding data and other known prognostic factors were correlated with survival. In univariate analysis, binding of HPA, Phaseolus vulgaris leukoagglutinin, and Ulex europaeus agglutinin to adenocarcinoma cells were prognostic indicators for overall and relapse-free survival, whereas Maackia amurenis agglutinin and Sambucus nigra agglutinin binding had no prognostic value. However, in a multivariate analysis next to stage and gender only HPA was a significant independent prognostic factor on survival. In conclusion, HPA binding was the primary marker-based predictor of prognosis in our patient population and allows to stratify patients with adenocarcinomas of the lung into a low- and a high-risk group.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.