Around the elbow, supracondylar injury of humerus is one of the conventional fractures which usually occurs at the age of 7 to 8 years. Various conservative techniques have been used for the management, which comprises of the splintage, tractions, open or closed reduction with k wire fixation. However, closed reduction and percutaneous pinning remains the mainstay of surgical management, for they have shown splendid outcomes according to many authors. Objectives: The aim of this study is to summarise and compare the radiological and functional results of two ways of fixation (cross and parallel closed K wires) of supracondylar fractures in children. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, Services Hospital, Lahore. Period: 1st January 2018 to 31st June 2018. Material & Methods: We included 180 patients (90 in each group). Results: The mean age was 6.45±2.34 years with 115(63.9%) male and 65(36.1%) female. Among the children who underwent fixation with cross k-wires, ulnar nerve injury was seen in 2(2.2%) cases and none were seen in the other group post operatively. Group A attained higher union rate at last follow up. 4(4.4%) cases in Cross K-wires and 19(21.1%) in two lateral k-wires gave outstanding outcome. In a nutshell, 60 in group A and 45 in group B showed excellent outcomes based on Flynn's criteria, p-value < 0.05. Conclusion: According to Flynn’s criteria, closed percutaneous cross K-wire fixation of supracondylar fracture of humerus is an effective management option in terms of finer functional results as compared to Parallel k-wires. Although, the rate of radiological union is higher in cross k-wire fixation, there are 2.2% chances of ulnar nerve injury.
Objective: To compare the functional outcomes of K-wire versus mini plate fixation for the treatment of fractures shaft of metacarpal. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial Place and Duration of Study: Department of Orthopaedic, Sahara Medical College, Narowal from 1st August 2020 to 31st January 2021. Methodology: Fifty six patients of both genders presented with fractures shaft of metacarpal were included. Patient’s ages were ranging between 15 to 60 years. Radiographic assessment was done to all the patients. Patients were categorized in to two equal groups. 28 patients treated with mini plates (group A) and 28 patients treated with K-wire fixation (group B). Post-operative complications were examined and compare between both groups. DASH scoring system was used for analyzing functional outcomes. Results: Mean age in group A was 34.57±7.84 years and in group B it was 34.95±7.76 years. Majority of patients 18 (64.29%) and 17 (60.71%) were males in group A and B. Mean time of union in group A was 9.58±2.24 weeks while in group B it was 12.33±2.85 weeks, the difference was statistically significant (p-value <0.05). As per DASH criteria, 15 (57.14%), 11 (39.29%) and 2 (7.14%) patients had excellent, good and fair functional outcomes who treated with mini plates internal fixation, while in group B 12 (42.86%), 13 (46.43%), 2 (7.14%) and 1 (3.57%) patients had excellent, good, fair and poor functional outcomes. Postoperative complications were more in group B as compared to group A but the difference was not statistically significant (p-value >0.05). Conclusion: Both procedures mini-plate internal fixation and K-wire fixation are effective for fractures shaft of metacarpal. However, mini-plates showed better functional outcomes with fewer rate of postoperative complications and earlier union as compared to K-wire internal fixation. Keywords: Shaft of metacarpal fracture, Internal fixation, Mini-plate, K-wire, DASH scoring system
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.