Forty patients were followed for an average period of 8 1/2 years after 44 consecutive suboccipital craniotomies for trigeminal neuralgia. Among these patients, 36 had microvascular decompression (MVD) of the nerve, four had repeat trigeminal rhizotomy after MVD was not successful in controlling their pain, and four had primary trigeminal rhizotomies. Of the 36 patients undergoing MVD, 17 (47%) experienced recurrent postoperative neuralgic pain: in 11 (31%) pain recurrence was major, and in six (17%) it was minor. Among the eight patients undergoing rhizotomy, four (50%) had major pain recurrences and one (13%) had a minor recurrence, for a 63% total recurrence rate. There was a strong statistical relationship between an operative finding of arterial cross-compression of the nerve and long-term complete pain relief. Patients with other compressive pathology (related to veins or bone structures) did not on the average fare as well. Despite this, there appeared to be no point in time in the postoperative interval when the patient could be considered "cured." Major recurrences averaged 3.5% annually, and minor recurrences averaged 1.5% annually. The implications of these findings for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia and the current understanding of the mechanism of MVD for this disorder are discussed.

No abstract

The excision of an arteriovenous malformation (AVM) located within eloquent neocortex presents a formidable neurosurgical challenge. Compromise of the vascular supply to normal surrounding brain or surgical trauma to essential neighboring neocortex may result in unacceptable postoperative neurological morbidity. In addition, successful removal of these lesions without the benefit of intraoperative corticography may leave in situ areas of highly epileptogenic brain, resulting in continued epilepsy. In this report, we describe eight patients who underwent craniotomy and excision of AVMs at our institutions. Six of these lesions were located in the dominant (left) hemisphere, and two were on the right. All patients underwent preoperative testing with Amytal administered via the carotid artery (Wada test). Subsequently, the patient was placed under local anesthesia, and we performed a craniotomy. Electrocorticography was used to identify epileptogenic brain in the region of the AVM and to establish after-discharge thresholds to electrical stimulation. Stimulation-mapping techniques were then used to delineate critical motor, sensory, and language areas. Trial occlusion of feeding vessels was also carried out to document postocclusion neurological deterioration, if any. At a later time, a second procedure was performed under general anesthesia to excise the lesion and any epileptogenic foci, using the cortical maps derived earlier. Using these techniques, it was possible to effect complete excision of these lesions in seven of eight patients without causing additional neurological deficits.

The sitting prone position is compared with the standard laminectomy prone position and the sitting up position for posterior fossa surgery. We measured central venous pressure and airway pressure with the patient in different positions to determine the comparative efficacy of the sitting prone position. On a linear average, the central venous pressure increased by 6.83 cm H2O and the airway pressure increased by 3.16 cm H2O when the patient was changed from the supine to the standard prone position under general anesthesia; with a change from the standard prone position to the sitting prone position, the central venous pressure decreased by 10.45 cm H2O and the airway pressure decreased by 3.66 cm H2O. However, comparing the sitting prone position for posterior fossa surgery with the sitting up position, there was no statistically significant difference in central venous or airway pressure.

A case of a 32-year-old man is reported with complex partial seizures secondary to a right inferior temporal epileptic focus immediately overlying an abnormality of the temporomandibular joint, with a defect in the middle temporal fossa that allowed the mandibular condyle to contuse the temporal lobe.

No abstract

The sitting prone position is compared with the standard laminectomy prone position and the sitting up position for posterior fossa surgery. We measured central venous pressure and airway pressure with the patient in different positions to determine the comparative efficacy of the sitting prone position. On a linear average, the central venous pressure increased by 6.83 cm H2O and the airway pressure increased by 3.16 cm H2O when the patient was changed from the supine to the standard prone position under general anesthesia; with a change from the standard prone position to the sitting prone position, the central venous pressure decreased by 10.45 cm H2O and the airway pressure decreased by 3.66 cm H2O. However, comparing the sitting prone position for posterior fossa surgery with the sitting up position, there was no statistically significant difference in central venous or airway pressure.