Background: Ketofol is a 1:1 mixture of ketamine and propofol that has been proposed for induction and maintenance of anesthesia aiming to provide more cardiovascular stability and less undesirable impacts compared to the use of propofol and ketamine alone. However, it has been associated with exacerbated respiratory depression in dogs. Diminishing the dose of ketofol may improve cardiovascular effects and attenuate respiratory depression. The present study was designed to evaluate the effect of adding lidocaine, fentanyl or dexmedetomidine at the required dose and cardiorespiratory variables in dogs undergoing total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with ketofol. In phase I, twelve dogs were induced and maintained with two out of four anesthetic regimens of KET: ketofol (4 mg/kg and 0.3 mg/kg/min, respectively), KLD; ketofol and lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg and 0.25 mg/kg/min, respectively), KFN: ketofol and fentanyl (LD: 5 µg/kg and 0.1 µg/kg/min, respectively) and KDX: ketofol and dexmedetomidine (2 µg/kg and 2 mg/kg/h, respectively). Minimum infusion rate (MIR) of ketofol was determined in this phase. Subsequently, in phase II, other twelve dogs were given the same anesthetic regimens for 60 min similar to the previous phase, except the infusion rate of ketofol. Cardiorespiratory variables were recorded in predetermined interval. Results: In phase I, mean MIR of ketofol for KET, KLD, KFN and KDX were determined to have decreasing manner as 0.35, 0.23, 0.15, and 0.08 mg/kg/min, respectively. In phase II, the times of recovery events were shorter in KFN and KDX than KET and KLD. Notably, HR was significantly higher than baseline during anesthesia in KET and KLD, which also was significantly lower than baseline in KFN and KDX at several time points. Significant higher values of MAP were observed over time in KDX. In all treatments, there was a decrease in respiratory rate and pH as well as an increase in PCO2 during the anesthesia session. Conclusions: It was concluded that despite decreasing the dose of ketofol, none of the added drugs attenuated respiratory depression caused by ketofol.
The present study was designed to compare the effects of lidocaine and ropivacaine in intravenous regional anaesthesia (IVRA) in dogs. Twelve adult male dogs were used.Under isoflurane anaesthesia, exsanguination was performed in the target forelimb.Then, a blood pressure cuff was encircled around the limb proximal to the elbow joint with a pressure of approximately 150 mmHg above the mean arterial blood pressure.The animals then received one of the two treatments of lidocaine (3 mg/kg) or ropivacaine (1.5 mg/kg) with a final volume of 0.6 mL/kg into the cephalic vein. After 60 min, the anaesthesia was disrupted and the tourniquet was removed using intermittent opening (30 s) and closing (5 min) manner for three times. The results revealed that at 20 and 30 min after the initiation of IVRA, the dogs in ROP showed higher analgesia than LID. A leakage under the tourniquet during IVRA was detected. Tremor and hypersalivation were observed after tourniquet removal in some dogs. It was concluded that ropivacaine might provide a higher quality of anaesthesia than lidocaine in IVRA in dogs. The development of local anaesthetic toxicity is a major concern and should be considered at the time of tourniquet removal.
The objective of the present study was to compare the effects of propofol and ketofol on intraocular pressure, tear production and cardiorespiratory variables in dogs premedicated with midazolam. Six castrated adult mixed-breed dogs were used in a cross-over design with a one-week interval. Twenty minutes after premedication with midazolam (0.2 mg/kg), animals were assigned randomly to two groups and received either propofol (6 mg/kg) or ketofol (3 mg/kg; 1 : 1 mg/ml ratio) treatments intravenously. Intraocular pressure, tear production, heart rate, respiratory rate, rectal temperature and direct mean arterial blood pressure were measured at base (before induction), and at 5, 10, 15, 20 and 30 min after induction of anaesthesia. Blood gas samples were obtained at base (before induction), and at 5, 15 and 30 min after administration of treatments. Intraocular pressure showed significantly higher values at 5 min after induction in ketofol compared with propofol (16.1 ± 4.5 mm Hg vs 8.2 ± 1.2 mm Hg, respectively). There were no significant changes in tear production in either group. Significantly higher heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure were detected in ketofol at several time points. Respiratory depression occurred in both groups with no significant differences between them. In conclusion, although ketofol improved heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure and did not elicit more pronounced respiratory depression than propofol, it resulted in significantly higher values of intraocular pressure at 5 min after administration in dogs. Despite the small number of dogs in this study, our results indicate that ketofol should not be recommended for ophthalmic surgical procedures in dogs. Appropriate oxygenation should be provided when propofol is used for ophthalmic surgeries.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.