These data showed that CYP2D6 poor metabolizers had a 5-fold higher risk for development of adverse effects during metoprolol treatment than patients who were not poor metabolizers. Because the absolute risk of adverse effects of metoprolol is unknown, the clinical relevance of the CYP2D6 genotype for metoprolol therapy has to be determined in a prospective manner.

After administration of metoprolol, plasma concentrations of the drug are markedly higher in CYP2D6 poor metabolizers (PMs) than in non-PMs. In a prospective double-blind 3-month study, we investigated whether this translates into differences in metoprolol's effects after initiation of therapy. Despite administering equal doses to PMs and non-PMs, metoprolol plasma concentrations were 4.9-fold higher in the PM group. Metoprolol evoked significantly and persistently greater reductions in heart rate, diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure in PMs than in non-PMs. It appears, therefore, that the CYP2D6 genotype contributes to interindividual differences in metoprolol response.

The results suggest that the CYP2D6 genotype is associated with the occurrence of adverse effects and clinical nonresponse in psychiatric patients treated with CYP2D6-dependent antidepressants.

The beta1 selective beta-blocker metoprolol is metabolized predominantly but not exclusively by CYP2D6. Due to the polymorphism of the CYP2D6 gene, CYP2D6 activity varies markedly between individuals. Consequently, after short-term administration metoprolol plasma concentrations were found to be several fold higher in poor metabolizers than in extensive metabolizers. However, it is currently not known, whether the impact of the CYP2D6 polymorphism persists during long-term therapy, since alternate mechanisms of elimination or metabolism could be effective in this setting. The study comprised 91 Caucasian patients on long-term treatment with metoprolol (median duration of treatment 12.6 months; median daily drug dose: 47.5 mg/day). Metoprolol and alpha-OH-metoprolol plasma concentrations were assessed by HPLC. Genotyping detected the null alleles (*0): *3, *4, *5, *6, *7, *8, *12, *14, *15, the alleles *9, *10 and *41 associated with reduced enzymatic activity as well as the fully functional alleles *1 and *2. Genotype and allele frequencies were in accordance with published frequencies for the German population. The plasma metabolic ratio of metoprolol/alpha-OH-metoprolol was markedly affected by the genotype (P < 0.0001). In accordance, median adjusted metoprolol plasma concentrations were 6.2- and 3.9-fold higher in patients with *0/*0 genotypes (n = 8) and intermediate genotypes (n = 10), respectively, as compared to those with two fully functional alleles (n = 31; P < 0.01). In summary, the pronounced effect of the CYP2D6 genotype persists during long-term therapy, affecting both metabolic ratio and metoprolol plasma concentration.

When switching treatment from one beta-blocker to the other, improvement of LVEF in patients with HF is maintained. Despite similar long-term effects on hemodynamics at rest, beta-adrenergic responsiveness is different in both treatments.

Background-Carvedilol but not metoprolol exhibits persistent binding to ␤-adrenergic receptors (␤-ARs) even after washout in cell culture experiments. Here, we determined the significance of this phenomenon on human ␤-ARs in vitro and in vivo. Methods and Results-Experiments were conducted on human atrial trabeculae (nϭ8 to 10 per group). In the presence of metoprolol, isoproterenol potency was reduced compared with controls (PϽ0.001). In the presence of carvedilol, isoproterenol identified 2 distinct binding sites of high (36Ϯ6%; Ϫ8.8Ϯ0.4 log mol/L) and low affinity (Ϫ6.5Ϯ0.2 log mol/L). After ␤-blocker washout, isoproterenol potency returned to control values in metoprolol-treated muscles, whereas in carvedilol-treated preparations, isoproterenol potency remained decreased (PϽ0.001 versus control). In vivo studies were performed in 9 individuals receiving metoprolol succinate (190 mg/d) or carvedilol (50 mg/d) for 11 days in a randomized crossover design. Dobutamine stress echocardiography (5 to 40 g · kg Ϫ1 · min

Br J Clin PharmacolAim Diclofenac-K has been recently launched at low oral doses in different countries for over-the-counter use. However, given the considerable first-pass metabolism of diclofenac, the degree of absorption of diclofenac-K at low doses remained to be determined. The aim of this study was to determine the bioavailability of low-dose diclofenac-K. MethodsA randomized, three-way, cross-over study was performed in 10 subjects. Each received diclofenac-K, 22.5 mg via short-term i.v. infusion and orally at single doses of 12.5 mg and 25 mg. ResultsMean ( ± SD) times to maximal plasma concentration ( t max ) of diclofenac were 0.48 ± 0.28 h (12.5 mg) and 0.93 ± 0.96 h (25 mg). The absolute bioavailability of diclofenac-K after oral administration did not differ significantly in the 12.5-mg and 25-mg dose group (63.1 ± 12.6% vs. 65.1 ± 19.4%, respectively). The 90% confidence intervals for the AUC • and AUC t ratios for the two oral regimes were 82.6, 103.4% (point estimate 92.4%) and 86.2, 112.9% (point estimate 98.6%), respectively. These values were within the acceptance criteria for bioequivalence (80-125%). ConclusionsOur data indicate that diclofenac-K is rapidly and well absorbed at low dose, and are consistent with a rapid onset of action of the drug.

No abstract