This case study presents the recent development of new 3D geological models for the Low Level Waste Repository in Cumbria through the review of historical and new datasets. The site is located in an area of complex Late Pleistocene glacial geology and geomorphology, which control near-surface groundwater movement, and benefits from extensive historical site characterization data. This work emphasizes the value of a quality review of existing borehole records, drilling techniques and supplementary information to build a predictive geological model. The integration of different datasets has proved crucial to our understanding of the ground conditions, which are characterized by complex Quaternary sequences, and the depositional processes responsible for their formation. The updated geological interpretation suggests that the Low Level Waste Repository is located on a former ice-dammed lake plain. This is contrary to the previous interpretation of multiple and extensive till units in the area. Although the permeabilities may be similar in both interpretations, the extents may be different. Understanding the depositional processes and extent and the hydrogeological characteristics of the deposits is key to developing a hydrogeological model that is appropriate for the assessment of the environmental safety of the site, both now and into the future.Thematic collection: This article is part of the Ground models in engineering geology and hydrogeology collection available at: https://www.lyellcollection.org/cc/Ground-models-in-engineering-geology-and-hydrogeology
<p>The issue of safely dealing with radioactive waste has been addressed in several countries by opting for a geological disposal solution, in which the waste material is isolated in a subsurface repository. Safety assessments of such facilities require an in-depth understanding of the environment they are constructed in. Assessments are commonly underpinned by simulations of groundwater flow and transport, using numerical models of the subsurface. Accordingly, it is imperative that the level of uncertainty associated with key model outputs is accurately characterised and communicated. Only in this way can decisions on the long-term safety and operation of these facilities be effectively supported by modelling.</p><p>In view of this, a new approach for quantifying uncertainty in the modelling process has been applied to hydrogeological models for the UK Low Level Waste Repository, which is constructed in a complex system of Quaternary sediments of glacial origins. Model calibration was undertaken against a dataset of observed groundwater heads, acquired from a borehole monitoring network of over 200 locations. The new methodology comprises an evolution of the calibration process, in which greater emphasis is placed on understanding the propagation of uncertainty. This is supported by the development of methods for evaluating uncertainty in the observed heads data, as well as the application of mathematical regularisation tools (Doherty, 2018) to constrain the solution and ensure stability of the inversion. Additional information sources, such as data on the migration of key solutes, are used to further constrain specific model parameters. The sensitivity of model predictions to the representation of heterogeneity and other geological uncertainties is determined by smaller studies. Then, with the knowledge of posterior parameter uncertainty provided by the calibration process, the resulting implications for model predictive capacity can be explored. This is achieved using the calibration-constrained Monte Carlo methodology developed by Tonkin and Doherty (2009).</p><p>The new approach affords greater insight into the model calibration process, providing valuable information on the constraining influence of the observed data as it pertains to individual model parameters. Similarly, characterisation of the uncertainty associated with different model outputs provides a deeper understanding of the model&#8217;s predictive power. Such information can also be used to determine the appropriate level of model complexity; the guiding principle being that additional complexity is justified only where it contributes either to the characterisation of expert knowledge of the system, or to the model&#8217;s capacity to represent details of the system&#8217;s behaviour that are relevant for the predictions of interest (Doherty, 2015). Finally, the new approach enables more effective communication of modelling results &#8211; and limitations &#8211; to stakeholders, which should allow management decisions to be better supported by modelling work.</p><p><strong>References:</strong></p><ul><li>Doherty, J., 2015. <em>Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis for Complex Environmental Models</em>. Watermark Numerical Computing, Brisbane, Australia. ISBN: 978-0-9943786-0-6.</li> <li>Doherty, J., 2018. <em>PEST Model-Independent Parameter Estimation. User Manual Part I. 7<sup>th</sup> Edition.</em> Watermark Numerical Computing, Brisbane, Australia.</li> <li>Tonkin, M. and Doherty. J., 2009. <em>Calibration-constrained Monte Carlo analysis of highly parameterized models using subspace techniques.</em> Water Resources Research, 45, W00B10.</li> </ul>
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.