The differences between optical and X-ray structures of galaxy clusters are discussed. We analyse in detail 7 Abell clusters. There is an increasing number of arguments in favour of different distributions of galaxies, gas, and dark matter in many dusters. We argue that most clusters present sub-structures at least in the gaseous and galactic components and, moreover, the subclustering of different components does not always coincide. Such arguments strongly support the idea that most galaxy clusters are by far more complex systems than accepted until now and are usually not in an hydrostatic isothermal equilibrium.Key words: galaxy clusters -structures -dominant galaxies A A A subject classification: 160 IntroductionGalaxy clusters are normally characterized by the BM types I, 11, and I11 or by the RS types cD, B, L, F, and I. Correlations between these morphological cluster types and the physical properties of the clusters are expected. This expectation concerns among others the X-ray properties. However many authors find only marginal evidence for such a correlation. In this connection the question arises which kind of observation is better suited for the description of the physical properties of galaxy clusters. Very often it is argued that optical observations are plagued by projection effects and by small number statistics. It is assumed that X-ray observations of clusters can overcome these problems because the relaxation time-scale of the X-ray emitting gas is much shorter than the age of a cluster. Thus, it is usually assumed that the gas is relaxed and the X-ray emission can be used as a tracer of the gravitational potential of clusters. A second point is that many galaxy clusters are observed to be commonly bright in X-rays due to the high gas densities in their cores. Therefore, they should be detected out to large redshifts making them useful probes of cosmological studies.Since all components of a given cluster share the total gravitational potential, it is assumed that both the intra-cluster medium and galaxy number densities are related to the potential well of the cluster in a similar way, or that dark matter, hot gas, and galaxy distribution evolve in a tightly coupled way (Frenk et al. 1995). Traditionally an hydrostatic equilibrium of both the hot intra-cluster gas and the galaxies with the binding cluster potential is assumed (e.g., Wu 1994, Lubin and Bahcalll993).In connection with all these theoretical considerations the distributions of different components in clusters (galaxies, gas, and dark matter) should show the same behaviour. The usefulness of the observation of one or more components is considered to be determined only by the possibility of observations. In principle, results from all such kinds of observations -galaxy distribution or X-ray emissivity, for example -should lead to equivalent results.However, the very observation of sub-structures in the majority of rich clusters, the different scale lengths of the various components in a cluster, or the so-called &problem, point to ...
We compiled informations with respect to optical structures, X-ray structures, cooling flow properties, and X-ray luminosities, respectively, for 342 nearby northern Abell clusters with central dominant galaxies.Key words: galaxy clusters -dominant galaxies -cooling flows AAA subject classification: 160 The existence of central dominant galaxies in clusters is a well-known phenomenon. The percentage of galaxy clusters with such galaxies or objects which are in an embryonic state of a cD galaxy is presumably higher by far than usually thought today. The investigation of the evolution of cD clusters and the formation of their dominant galaxies may provide a key for the understanding of the evolution of galaxy clusters at all.The most promising scenarios for the formation of central dominant galaxies in clusters are growth by cooling This catalogue presents a compilation of results with respect to the structures of galaxy clusters with central dominant galaxies and z 5 0.1 deduced from the optical and X-ray observations given in the literature. On the other hand it contains all the available data with respect to X-ray luminosities and estimated accretion rates of cooling flows for these clusters. It is a first step to collect all the available data to discuss the evolution of clusters and their central dominant galaxies. Normally, galaxy clusters are characterized by the BM types I, 11, and I11 or by the RS types cD, B, L, C, F, and I. Correlations of the physical properties of clusters (e.g. radial luminosity segregation, morphological segregation, X-ray emission, accretion rate of a connected cooling flow) in comparison with these morphological cluster types are expected. But many authors find only marginal evidence for such correlations. Sometimes the lack of any clear correlation is explained by selection effects. But we should wonder, if the above given morphological types are an unambiguous expression of the physical evolutionary stages of galaxy clusters. Perhaps we should try to find new criterions for the characterization of galaxy clusters.In this paper we compiled optical and X-ray data for 342 galaxy clusters with central dominant galaxies and with z 5 0.1. From the catalogue of morphological properties of galaxy clusters by Struble and Rood (1987) we found that nearly 90 percent of the objects contain brightest cluster members of the morphological types cD, gE, E, B, SO, b, and t. According to recent results of some authors (e.g. Capaccioli et al. 1990, Michard and Marchal 1994), SO galaxies should not be considered as a seperated class of objects. Rather we should consider a continuity between ellipticals and SO galaxies. Therefore, we have to consider the brightest cluster members of the different morphological types as different evolutionary stages of central dominant galaxies. Because of the high percentage the existence of central dominant galaxies in clusters seems to be the rule and not the exception.An essential aspect of cluster evolution seems to be the fact that dominant galaxies occur fre...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.