No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

a b s t r a c tBackground: The anaesthetic approach adopted in ECT practice has the potential to influence patient outcomes. However, the impact of the time interval between anaesthetic induction and ECT stimulus administration has not been studied prospectively to date. This variable may represent an indirect measure of anaesthetic concentration at the time of stimulation, and therefore may influence the quality of seizures induced. Objective: To examine the impact of the anaesthetic to ECT stimulus time interval, and ventilation rate pre-treatment, on ictal seizure quality. Methods: In a prospective, crossover trial, 54 depressed participants were randomised to variations in anaesthetic technique at four sequential ECT treatment sessions, in a 2 x 2 design: randomisation to a short or long anaesthetic-ECT time interval, and randomisation to normal ventilation or hyperventilation during anaesthetic induction with thiopentone. Ictal EEG data were collected at each study session and assessed by a blinded rater for ictal quality (seizure amplitude, regularity, post-ictal suppression and general seizure quality), using a quantitative-qualitative structured rating scale. Linear mixed effects models were used to analyse the effect of the anaesthetic-ECT time interval, and that of ventilation rate, on seizure quality indices. Results: The anaesthetic-ECT time interval had a significant impact on ictal EEG quality indices (p < 0.01), with longer time intervals producing higher quality seizures. Ventilation rate did not significantly influence quality measures. Conclusion: The time between anaesthetic induction and ECT stimulus administration has a significant impact on ictal EEG seizure quality. Conversely, manipulations of ventilation rate did not significantly affect seizure quality. These results suggest the anaesthetic-ECT time interval should be routinely monitored clinically and potentially optimised for maximising seizure quality with ECT.

No abstract

Halothane (1% v/v inspired) was administered for 60 min to six children of mean age 74 months (range 14-119 months). Uptake of halothane was measured from the difference in the concentration in inspired and expired gas and varied from 176 to 310 mg kg-1, depending on minute ventilation. After administration of halothane ceased, its elimination in expired gas was measured in four patients until the conclusion of anaesthesia; 32-37% of the absorbed halothane was expired 90 min after halothane administration ceased. Urinary excretion of trifluoroacetic acid, fluoride and bromide was measured for up to 1 week. Of the absorbed halothane, 11.4% (range 6.3-18.2%) was excreted in urine as trifluoroacetic acid and 0.37% (range 0.10-0.64%) as inorganic fluoride. The urinary half-life of trifluoracetic acid was 41.8 h (range 10.4-59.1 h). The quantitative and qualitative metabolism of halothane via the reductive and oxidative pathways in children are comparable to values found in adults. No differences in the metabolism of halothane by children were found which would explain the different incidence of halothane-associated hepatitis compared with adults.

There have been no previous reports in the anaesthetic literature regarding the airway management during anaesthesia of patients with a lipid storage disease. In a 40-year period (1942-1982) at a busy paediatric hospital 15 patients with a lipid storage disease were anaesthetised on 19 occasions. Eight patients were intubated, three of them twice. No difficulties in airway management during anaesthesia were documented.