In this paper it is argued that the origin of the unremitting price increases of academic journals is at the demand site of the serials market. Given that for each and every scientific article the publisher is monopolist, for which he may or may not charge the monopoly price, almost the only thing which can explain the upward trend in prices are changing elasticities of demand. It is suggested that the enormous increase of scientific publications in the aftermath of the institutionalisation of the publish or perish regime in combination with the library organisation at most universities precisely produces this result. Libraries are organised as a common pool and the real consumer hardly faces any budget constraint. When offering contracts for digital access, the publishers' strategy seems to be bundling and first degree price discrimination. Prices of the bundles will be determined in negotiations. Empowerment of the university negotiaters requires that they have some influence on the impact score of a bundle. The paper ends with a few suggestions of how extraordinarily expensive commercial publishers can be punished by redirecting the real consumers' web searches. These suggestions imply that the common pool character of the library is gradually given up.Library Organisation, Academic Publishing, Digital Access,
It is argued that Prof. Morishima's treatment of Ricardo's theorems concerning relative price movements following changes in income distribution cannot count as a reasonable interpretation of Ricardo. Firstly, Ricardo linked up these price movements not only to diverging capital intensities, but also to diverging depreciation rates. Secondly, Prof. Morishima's proof seems to depend on a technology specification which is also characteristic of Sraffa's nonbasic commodity. A more reasonable interpretation seems to be that Ricardo tried to investigate a number of modifications on the 'principle' that relative prices are regulated by labour values. It is shown that Ricardo's theorems were, as first approximations, not at all bad.In his penetrating Ricardo's Economics, a General Equilibrium Theory of Distribution and Growth (1989), Prof. Morishima holds that Ricardo's conjecture about relative price-movements following changes in income distribution is not entirely valid. Prof. Morishima shows that the price of a relatively labour-intensive produced commodity can decline with respect to the price of a relatively capital-intensive produced commodity when the wage rate increases.It is, of course, well known from Sraffa (1960, pp. 14-15) and from further elucidations by Abraham-Frois and Berribi (1976, pp. 64-68) and Pasinetti (1977, pp. 82-84) that Ricardo's proposition -taken on its
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.