The problem of modeling expert knowledge about numerical parameters in the field of reliability is reconsidered in the framework of possibility theory. Usually expert opinions about quantities such as failure rates are modeled, assessed, and pooled in the setting of probability theory. This approach does not seem to always be natural since probabilistic information looks too rich to be currently supplied by individuals. Indeed, information supplied by individuals is often incomplete, imprecise rather than tainted with randomness. Moreover, the probabilistic framework looks somewhat restrictive to express the variety of possible pooling modes. In this paper, we formulate a model of expert opinion by means of possibility distributions that are thought to better reflect the imprecision pervading expert judgments. They are weak substitutes to unreachable subjective probabilities. Assessment evaluation is carried out in terms of calibration and level of precision, respectively, measured by membership grades and fuzzy cardinality indexes. Last, drawing from previous works on data fusion using possibility theory, we present various pooling modes with their formal model under various assumptions concerning the experts. A comparative experiment between two computerized systems for expert opinion analysis has been carried out, and its results are presented in this paper.
A theory is given for the spectral profile of the first hydrogen Balmer line when the radiating neutral atom is under influence of both (quasi-) static and harmonically oscillating electric fields. Profiles, measured in a turbulent heating experiment, show a series of intensity maxima on the wings of the Balmer lines. If we assume a model for the spatial distribution of turbulent wave vectors, we can derive the fieldstrength and the direction of low-frequency (ion-acoustic) oscillations and the strength and frequency of high-frequency (Langmuir) oscillations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.