BackgroundFollowing radical nephro-ureterectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract (UUT), the reported bladder recurrence rate of urothelial carcinoma is 22–47%. A single intravesical instillation of chemotherapy within 10 days following nephro-ureterectomy has the potential to decrease the risk of a bladder recurrence significantly. Despite recommendation by the European Association of Urology guideline to administer a single instillation postoperatively, the compliance rate is low because the risk of extravasation of chemotherapy.AimTo reduce the risk of bladder cancer recurrence by a single intravesical instillation of Mitomycin immediately (within 3 h) before radical nephro-ureterectomy or partial ureterectomy.MethodsAdult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with a (suspicion of a) urothelial carcinoma of the UUT undergoing radical nephro-ureterectomy or partial ureterectomy will be eligible and will receive a single intravesical instillation of Mitomycin within 3 h before surgery. In total, 170 patients will be included in this prospective, observational study. Follow-up will be according to current guidelines.ResultsThe primary endpoint is the bladder cancer recurrence rate up to two years after surgery. Secondary endpoints are: a) the compliance rate; b) oncological outcome; c) possible side-effects; d) the quality of life; e) the calculation of costs of a single neoadjuvant instillation with Mitomycin and f) molecular characterization of UUT tumors and intravesical recurrences.ConclusionsA single intravesical instillation of Mitomycin before radical nephro-ureterectomy or partial ureterectomy may reduce the risk of a bladder recurrence in patients treated for UUT urothelial carcinoma and will circumvent the disadvantages of current therapy.
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES:The value of targeted prostate biopsy via MRI guidance has been established for men undergoing repeat biopsy. In men undergoing first biopsy, we conducted a prospective trial, using each man as his own control, to test the value of targeted biopsy (TBx) (cognitive and MR/US fusion) vs TRUS-guided standard 12-core biopsy (SBx) (PAIREDCAP Trial).METHODS: Study was IRB-approved and NCI-funded. A powered sample of 226 biopsy-naive men with elevated PSA underwent 3T multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). Mean age¼65 yrs (SD 6.8) and median PSA¼5.9 ng/mL ). Men with PI-RADS 3 lesions (n¼176) all underwent, in this order at one sitting, (1) SBx, (2) cognitive targeted biopsy directed by in-room radiologist, and (3) MR/US fusion targeted biopsy. Men with PI-RADS < 3 (n¼50) underwent SBx only. Primary outcome was detection of Gleason score (GS) 3+4 prostate cancer (cancer detection rate, CDR).RESULTS: 176 men had PI-RADS 3 (Fig 1). Overall CDR in these men was 69% (121/176); 7% (12/176) were detected only by a TBx. CDR increased with PI-RADS score; concordant CDR of SBx and TBx were directly related to PI-RADS score (Fig 2). TBx alone contributed 17% of positive biopsies for PI-RADS 3 lesions but only 8% for PI-RADS 5 lesions. PSA density (PSAD) was also predictive of overall CDR: 87% for PSAD 0.15 ng/ml/cc and 50% for PSAD <0.15 ng/ml/cc (p<0.01). Among men with PI-RADS 4 lesions, CDR increased by 50% when PSAD exceeded 0.15 (27/30 if PSAD 0.15; 16/28 if PSAD <0.15; p<0.01). CDR was inversely related to prostate volume but not related to MRI region of interest (ROI) diameter. CDR by MR/US fusion was higher than the cognitive method irrespective of all other variables (p<0.01). In the 50 men with PI-RADS < 3 (no ROI to target), CDR was 16% (8/50) by standard 12-core biopsy.CONCLUSIONS: In biopsy-naive men, TBx provides only marginal benefit over SBx in CaP detection. The combination led to the highest CDR. PI-RADS score and PSAD are important predictors of clinically-significant CaP.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.