No abstract

IntroductionNon-invasive assessment of steatosis and fibrosis is of growing relevance in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). 1H-Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) and the ultrasound-based controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) correlate with biopsy proven steatosis, but have not been correlated with each other so far. We therefore performed a head-to-head comparison between both methods.MethodsFifty patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD and 15 healthy volunteers were evaluated with 1H-MRS and transient elastography (TE) including CAP. Steatosis was defined according to the percentage of affected hepatocytes: S1 5-33%, S2 34–66%, S3 ≥67%.ResultsSteatosis grade in patients with NAFLD was S1 36%, S2 40% and S3 24%. CAP and 1H-MRS significantly correlated with histopathology and showed comparable accuracy for the detection of hepatic steatosis: areas under the receiver-operating characteristics curves were 0.93 vs. 0.88 for steatosis ≥S1 and 0.94 vs. 0.88 for ≥S2, respectively. Boot-strapping analysis revealed a CAP cut-off of 300 dB/m for detection of S2-3 steatosis, while retaining the lower cut-off of 215 dB/m for the definition of healthy individuals. Direct comparison between CAP and 1H-MRS revealed only modest correlation (total cohort: r = 0.63 [0.44, 0.76]; NAFLD cases: r = 0.56 [0.32, 0.74]). For detection of F2–4 fibrosis TE had sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 98.1% at a cut-off value of 8.85 kPa.ConclusionOur data suggest a comparable diagnostic value of CAP and 1H-MRS for hepatic steatosis quantification. Combined with the simultaneous TE fibrosis assessment, CAP represents an efficient method for non-invasive characterization of NAFLD. Limited correlation between CAP and 1H-MRS may be explained by different technical aspects, anthropometry, and presence of advanced liver fibrosis.

No abstract

The natural course of HCV infection remains controversial. The German HCV (1b)-contaminated anti-D cohort provides an ideal population to investigate the natural course of HCV infection in a large, homogenous cohort of young women from the date of HCV inoculation. Our previous follow-up studies at 20 and 25 years after infection suggested slow fibrosis progression rates in this unique cohort. The aim of our prospective, community-based, multicenter study was to reevaluate the liver disease progression in 718 patients of the original anti-D cohort at 35 years after infection. Patients with self-limited HCV infection (n 5 189) were compared to those who failed to eliminate the virus spontaneously (n 5 529), comprising patients who were treatment na€ ıve (n 5 197) or achieved a sustained virological response (SVR; n 5 149), respectively, failed to clear the virus (non-SVR; n 5 183) after antiviral therapy. In the overall cohort, 9.3% of patients showed clinical signs of liver cirrhosis at 35 years after infection. Liver disease progression largely depended on HCV infection status. The highest proportion of patients with clinical signs of end-stage liver disease was observed in the non-SVR group (15.3%), whereas decreased cirrhosis rates were detected in the SVR group (6%) and in patients with self-limited HCV infection (1.1%; P 5 6.2 3 10 26 ). Overall survival was significantly enhanced after SVR, compared to treatment-na€ ıve patients or non-SVR (P 5 0.027). Conclusion: The present study provides further evidence for a mild, but significant, disease progression at 35 years after infection in the German HCV (1b)-contaminated anti-D cohort. Patients with self-limited HCV infection or SVR after antiviral treatment were protected from progressive liver disease and showed the best clinical long-term outcome. (HEPATOLOGY 2014;59:49-57) H epatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the leading cause of end-stage liver disease (ESLD) in the world and represents a major burden for national health systems. 1 The World Health Organisation (WHO) and international consensus conferences refer to the high chronification rate of HCV infection, the risk of subsequent HCV-related complications, including end-stage liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and the high costs for antiviral therapy, respectively, liver transplantation (LT). 2,3 It is estimated that HCV-related morbidity and mortality will increase in the next decade. [4][5][6] The predicted cumulative probability of cirrhosis approximates 20% at 20 years after HCV infection and