No abstract

In the present study a direct manipulation of the optical expansion pattern was carried out. What happens to the timing of the grasp movements involved in catching a ball when optical expansion information is not veridically provided? By using 2 luminescent balls of constant size and a luminescent ball that could change its diameter during flight, it was possible to manipulate the rate of optical expansion directly. The results of 2 experiments (binocular vision in Experiment 1 and monocular vision in Experiment 2) showed that the time of the maximal closing velocity of the hand--which conforms to the prediction if Ss use retinal expansion information--was later for the deflating ball than for the balls of constant size. Adjustments to the aperture of the hand in response to the different ball sizes, especially the adjustment of the hand to the deflating ball (even though Ss were not aware that the ball was deflating during its approach), point to a finely attuned perception-action coupling.

Abstract. The goal of this study was to investigate whether ocular and hand motor systems operate independently or whether they share processes. Using dualtask methodology, reaction time (RT) latencies of saccadic eye and hand motor responses were measured. In experiment 1, the hand and eye motor systems produced rapid, aimed pointing movements to a visual target, which could occur either to the left or right of a central fixation point. Results showed that RT latencies of the eye response were slower in the dual-task condition than in the single-task condition, whereas the RT latencies of the hand response were virtually the same in both conditions. This interference effect indicated that the ocular and manual motor systems are not operating independently when initiating saccadic eye and goal-directed hand movements. Experiment 2 employed the same experimental paradigm as experiment 1, except for one important modification. Instead of a goal-directed hand movement to the target stimulus, subjects had to make a button-press response with either the index or middle finger of the right hand dependent upon whether the stimulus occurred to the right or left of the control fixation point. The aim of experiment 2 was to investigate the issue whether the observed interference effect in experiment 1 was specific or non-specific (e.g. overhead costs due to coordinating any two responses). The finding that saccadic eye movements and button-press responses in the dual-task condition could be initiated without delay relative to the single-task conditions, supports the specific interference interpretation.

In order to explore the nature and amount of information in the optic array used by subjects required to carry out one-handed catching actions, the optical expansion pattern (using a deflating ball) and the duration of viewing time (using liquid crystal spectacles) of the ball were varied. Subjects were required to catch luminous balls (two of constant physical size and one of changing physical size during approach) attached to a pendulum in a totally dark room, while the liquid spectacles were closed at 0, 100, 200 or 300 ms before hand-ball contact. The results confirmed previous findings that the timing of the catching action is based on retinal expansion information and that conclusion was strengthened when an additional dependent variable (time of the maximal opening velocity of the grasp) was used. Further, for the viewing time duration manipulations, the time of the maximal closing velocity of the hand was later, while no effect was found on the time of the maximal opening velocity, when the last 300 ms of the trajectory of the ball was occluded. Adjustments to the catching action in response to the different ball sizes under the 0 ms condition differed significantly from the adjustments under the 300 ms condition. Both findings point to the importance of relative optical expansion information, available between 300 and 200 ms before ball-hand contact, in maintaining a (relatively) continuous perception-action coupling in the act of catching.

Inter- and intra-sensory modality matching by 8-year-old children diagnosed as having hand-eye co-ordination problems (HECP) and by a control group of children without such problems were tested using a target-location and pointing task. The task required the children to locate target pins visually (seen target), with the hand (felt target) or in combination (felt and seen target), while pointing to the located target was always carried out without vision. The most striking finding, for both the control and the HECP children, was the superiority of performance when the target had to be located visually. When combined scores for both hands were analysed, the HECP children showed inferior performance to the control children in both inter- and intra-modal matching. Analyses of the scores achieved with the preferred and non-preferred hand separately, however, demonstrated that the differences between the HECP and the control children could, in the main, be attributed to lowered performances when the non-preferred hand was used for pointing to the target. When pointing with the preferred hand, the only significant difference between the groups was when the target was visually located, the control children showing superior performance. Pointing with the non-preferred hand gave rise to significant differences, in favour of the control children, when the target was located visually, with the hand or in combination. These findings suggest that earlier studies, using only the preferred hand or a combination of the scores of both hands, might need to be qualified. Putative neurological disorders in the HECP children are invoked to account for the poor performance with the non-preferred hand.