Intravenous ganciclovir is the standard treatment for cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients. Oral valganciclovir is a more convenient alternative. In a randomized, international trial, recipients with cytomegalovirus disease were treated with either 900 mg oral valganciclovir or 5 mg/kg i. Oral valganciclovir shows comparable safety and is not inferior to i.v. ganciclovir for treatment of cytomegalovirus disease in organ transplant recipients and provides a simpler treatment strategy, but care should be taken in extrapolating to organ transplant recipients not properly represented in the present study.

No abstract

Long-term voriconazole treatment is a new therapeutic option for invasive aspergillosis with bone involvement.

†Other members of the VICTOR study group are listed in the Appendix.The effect of herpesvirus co-infections (HHV-6, HHV-7) on cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease and its response to therapy is unknown. We prospectively analyzed herpesvirus co-infections in transplant recipients with CMV disease. All patients received 3 weeks of antiviral therapy. Samples were collected at baseline (day 0) and then day 3, 7, 14 and 21 poststart of therapy. Viral load testing for CMV, HHV-6 and HHV-7 was done using quantitative PCR assays in 302 patients of whom 256 had documented symptomatic CMV viremia. In this subset, day 0 HHV-6 co-infection was present in 23/253 (9.1%) and HHV-7 in 17/253 (6.7%). Including those positive at any time point raised the prevalence to 79/256 (30.9%) for HHV-6 and 75/256 (29.3%) for HHV-7. Viral co-infection did not influence the response of CMV disease to antiviral therapy. Baseline CMV viral loads, time to eradication and risk of recurrence were similar in patients with and without HHV-6 or HHV-7 co-infection. Ganciclovir and valganciclovir had no clear effect on HHV-6 and HHV-7 viremia. In conclusion, herpesvirus co-infections are common in patients with CMV disease but with standard antiviral therapy, no clear clinical effects are discernable. Routine monitoring for viral co-infection in patients with CMV disease is not indicated.

The Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) transforms B cells in part by inhibiting the cellular apoptotic programme. This is also observed when Burkitt lymphoma cell lines are infected with EBV. Induction of apoptosis is one of the mechanisms by which¯udarabine inhibits the growth of cells with low proliferative capacity. This compound can also inhibit several other mechanisms in the cell, including inhibition of the synthesis of factors such as STAT1. To analyse the relationship between EBV status,¯udarabine-induced apoptosis, and transcription factors we studied the EBV-negative Burkitt lymphoma cell line BL2, its EBV-infected counterpart BL2.B95.8 and the EBV-transformed cell line PRI. The BL2 cell line was found to be very sensitive to¯udarabine. The BL2.B95.8 and PRI cells were both resistant but the latter to a lesser extent. In the PRI cells¯udarabine activated p53, but not in the BL2.B95.8 cells in which the p53 pathway is inactivated. We observed that this inactivation results in part from the lack of expression of the MDM2 inhibitor p14ARF. Conversely, there was a substantial constitutive activation of STAT1, and not of the other STATs, in the BL2.B95.8 cells and a modest one in the PRI cells. Furthermore, expression of STAT1 was signi®cantly reduced by¯udarabine treatment in the PRI cells, but not in the BL2.BL95.8 cells. Finally, the expression of p21WAF1/CIP1 was detected only in the BL2.B95.8 and PRI cells. This protein, known to play a role in cell survival, may therefore be involved in the resistance of the BL2.B95.8 cells to¯udarabine.