Enteral nutrition (EN) by means of oral nutritional supplements (ONS) and tube feeding (TF) offers the possibility of increasing or ensuring nutrient intake in cases where normal food intake is inadequate. These guidelines are intended to give evidence-based recommendations for the use of ONS and TF in nephrology patients. They were developed by an interdisciplinary expert group in accordance with officially accepted standards and are based on all relevant publications since 1985. They were discussed and accepted in a consensus conference. Because of the nutritional impact of renal diseases, EN is widely used in nephrology practice. Patients with acute renal failure (ARF) and critical illness are characterized by a highly catabolic state and need depurative techniques inducing massive nutrient loss. EN by TF is the preferred route for nutritional support in these patients. EN by means of ONS is the preferred way of refeeding for depleted conservatively treated chronic renal failure patients and dialysis patients. Undernutrition is an independent factor of survival in dialysis patients. ONS was shown to improve nutritional status in this setting. An increase in survival has been recently reported when nutritional status was improved by ONS.

In sodium profiling, the sodium concentration in the dialysis fluid, instead of being constant, follows a time-dependent profile over the course of a hemodialysis session. The main aim of this manipulation is to avoid osmotic disequilibrium by keeping plasma osmolality in the physiological range. Further advantages of sodium profiling are a reduction in the incidence of muscle cramps, improved sodium removal, and improved vascular stability. Many different profiles have been used by various investigators. However, if sodium profiling is not appropriately conducted, sodium accumulation with resulting augmented thirst, increase of interdialytic weight gain, and hypertension may result. Sodium accumulation may, in fact, explain the reduced intradialytic morbidity reported in some short-term sodium profiling studies. Randomized, double-blind studies meeting strict statistical criteria and providing a careful control to maintain equivalent sodium balances between the compared treatments are difficult to perform and have not yet been published. However, because sodium profiling has potential benefits, provided that sodium balance is carefully controlled, it should nevertheless be regarded as a tool that experienced nephrologists can use for the treatment of patients who experience intolerable side effects during standard dialysis.

No abstract

Background & aims: Protein-energy wasting (PEW) is increasingly becoming a clinical problem in maintenance hemodialysis patients and guidelines call for nutritional interventions. Serum prealbumin (transthyretin) represents a critical nutritional marker positively correlated with patient survival and negatively correlated with morbidity. Nutritional counseling, oral supplementation as well as intradialytic parenteral nutrition (IDPN) are recommended to fight PEW, however clinical trials on their use are scarce. Methods: We conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled, parallel-group Phase IV clinical trial in 107 maintenance hemodialysis patients suffering from PEW to assess the impact of IDPN on prealbumin and other biochemical and clinical parameters reflecting nutritional status. Patients randomized to the intervention group received standardized nutritional counseling plus IDPN three times weekly over 16 weeks followed by a treatment-free period of 12 weeks. The control group received standardized nutritional counseling only. Main trial inclusion criteria included moderate to severe malnutrition (SGA score B or C), maintenance hemodialysis therapy (3 times per week) for more than six months, and presence of two out of the following three criteria: albumin <35 g/L, prealbumin <250 mg/L, phase angle alpha <4.5 assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). Changes in serum prealbumin, albumin, transferrin, phase angle alpha, subjective global assessment (SGA) score and health-related quality of life using the 12-item short form health survey (SF-12) were investigated. Results: IDPN significantly increased prealbumin (p < 0.05), showing rapid rise within 16 weeks of treatment and sustained response thereafter. In the full analysis set (n ¼ 83), 41.0% of 39 patients receiving IDPN achieved a relevant (i.e., at least !15%) increase in prealbumin over baseline at week 4 compared to 20.5% of 44 patients in the control group. Considerably more patients with IDPN therapy achieved an increment of prealbumin >30 mg/L at week 16 (48.7% vs. 31.8%). Prealbumin response to IDPN therapy was more prominent in patients suffering from moderate malnutrition (SGA score B) compared to patients with severe malnutrition (SGA score C). Conclusions: The results of this trial demonstrate for the first time that IDPN therapy, given three times weekly in a 16-week short-term intervention, results in a statistically significant and clinically relevant

No abstract