After taking down the colostomy in a patient who has previously undergone a Hartmann's operation, it is possible to restore bowel continuity using the single-port technique via the colostomy site itself. This study presents our experience of this approach using the glove port and standard laparoscopic instrumentation. Between October 2010 and October 2013, 14 patients [median age 62 years (range 42-83 years); median body mass index 25.2 kg/m(2) (range 22.7-34.9) kg/m(2)] underwent attempted single-port (via colostomy site) reversal of Hartmann's. All but one patient had had a laparotomy for their primary surgery. The glove port was used with a camera and two working ports. Additional remote access was needed in 3 (21 %) patients [1 × 5 mm port (two patients); 2 × 5-mm ports ; 2 × 5-mm ports and Pfannenstiel]. Median operative time was 150 min (range 75-270 min). Mortality was nil. One patient required reoperation and a stoma. Median hospital stay was 5 days (range 2-36 days). Glove port reversal of Hartmann's is technically possible, though challenging if extensive adhesions are present. Outcomes are variable. Further studies will be needed to assess whether this is a safe technique.

OBJECTIVE: Flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) is increasingly being accepted as the method of choice for initial investigation of rectal bleeding and other lower gastrointestinal symptoms. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of FS in general practice and to compare the yield, cost and efficiency of a service provided by a consultant surgeon and a General Practitioner (GP). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A prospective study of FS was undertaken on 430 unsedated patients with symptoms suggestive of lower bowel disease in two general practices. RESULTS: The yield was comparable to hospital based data. Fifteen (3.5%) cancers were detected, of which 40% were Dukes A, and 46 (10.7%) adenomatous polyps. Cost per patient examination by a GP including capital costs, depreciation of equipment, and training was calculated to be cheaper or at least equivalent to a hospital-based service but inefficient due to the low numbers examined per month. There were no complications and no missed cancers after a minimum follow up of 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that FS can be safely performed by a suitably trained GP in health centres, but better utilization of equipment and value for money would be obtained by providing the service for a group of practices rather than a single practice as in this study.

Background Abdominoperineal excision (APE) for rectal cancer is associated with a relatively high risk of positive margins and postoperative morbidity, particularly related to perineal wound healing problems. It is unknown whether the use of a minimally invasive approach for the perineal part of these procedures can improve postoperative outcomes without oncological compromise. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of minimally invasive transperineal abdominoperineal excision (TpAPE) Methods This multicenter retrospective cohort study included all patients having TpAPE for primary low rectal cancer. The primary endpoint was the intraoperative complication rate. Secondary endpoints included major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3), histopathology results, and perineal wound healing. Results A total of 32 TpAPE procedures were performed in five centers. A bilateral extralevator APE (ELAPE) was performed in 17 patients (53%), a unilateral ELAPE in 7 (22%), and an APE in 8 (25%). Intraoperative complications occurred in five cases (16%) and severe postoperative morbidity in three cases (9%). There were no perioperative deaths. A positive margin (R1) was observed in four patients (13%) and specimen perforation occurred in two (6%). The unilateral extralevator TpAPE group had worse specimen quality and a higher proportion of R1 resections than the bilateral ELAPE or standard APE groups. The rate of uncomplicated perineal wound healing was 53% (n = 17) and three patients (9%) required surgical reintervention. Conclusions TpAPE seems to be feasible with acceptable perioperative morbidity and a relatively low rate of perineal wound dehiscence, while histopathological outcomes remain suboptimal. Additional evaluation of the viability of this technique is needed in the form of a prospective trial with standardization of the procedure, indication, audit of outcomes and performed by surgeons with vast experience in transanal total mesorectal excision.

Patients with prolapse have a higher concentration of elastin fibres in the skin, and these differences are quantitatively demonstrated through mechanical testing. This suggests that the aetiology may be a result of a dysfunction of elastin fibre assembly.

In this small cohort of patients with R1 positive rectal cancers, response to NAC is the strongest predictor of poor overall and disease-free survival. In patients who respond to NAC, OS and DFS has been shown to be positive, with a reduced rate of EMV.