In our group of metastatic breast cancer patients, elevated HER-2/neu ECD levels are associated with decreased overall survival. With regard to progression-free survival, particularly patients with high HER-2/neu ECD levels seem to benefit from taxane-containing chemotherapy.
Invasive tumor cells and their microenvironments are enriched with a broad spectrum of different proteases. Legumain, a novel asparaginyl endopeptidase, has been observed to be highly expressed in several types of solid tumors. However, there is no data available identifying the relationship of legumain expression and clinicopathologic or biological variables in invasive breast cancer. For the first time, the prevalence of legumain expression in invasive breast cancer (n = 432) and non-neoplastic breast tissues (n = 128) was investigated by immunohistochemistry. Three staining patterns were observed in the cytoplasm: diffuse positivity, tiny dots and vesicles. Whereas vesicular positivity in the majority of tumor cells was significantly correlated to an adverse outcome, cytoplasmic and dot-like staining showed no prognostic effect. Vesicular positivity was observed in 24% of carcinomas, but only in one case of non-neoplastic breast tissue (<1%; proliferative mastopathy). This staining pattern was found to be independent of other factors analysed as grading, nodal status or HER2 expression. Besides being of prognostic value, legumain might prove to be an important predictive factor in breast cancer, since its unique cleavage specificity is already used in prodrug activation strategies.
BackgroundChemotherapy dose delay and/or reduction lower relative total dose intensity (RTDI) and may affect short- and long-term outcome of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients.MethodsBased on 933 individual patients' data of from 3 randomized MBC trials using an anthracycline and taxane we examined the impact of RTDI on efficacy and determined the lowest optimal RTDI for MBC patients.ResultsMedian time to disease progression (TTDP) and overall survival (OS) of all patients were 39 and 98 weeks. Overall higher RTDI was correlated with a shorter TTDP (log-rank p = 0.0525 for 85% RTDI cut-off). Proportional hazards assumption was violated, there was an early drop in the TTDP-curve for the high RTDI group. It was explained by the fact that patients with primary disease progression (PDP) do have a high RTDI per definition. Excluding those 114 patients with PDP the negative correlation between RTDI and TTDP vanished. However, non-PDP patients with RTDI-cut-off levels <85% showed a shorter OS than patients with higher RTDI levels (p = 0.0086).ConclusionsOptimizing RTDI above 85% appears to improve long-term outcome of MBC patients receiving first-line chemotherapy. Lowering RTDI had no negative influence on short term outcome like OR and TTDP.
The combined assessment of Skp2 and p27 identifies aggressive breast cancer. In long-term follow-up, high Skp2 and low p27 indicate an unfavorable course. Beyond the prognostic importance of the Skp2/p27 index, it could serve as a predictive marker for new molecular targeted therapies aiming at Skp2.
HER-2/neu amplification does not adversely influence response to first-line chemotherapy with either ET or EC. Furthermore, a taxane-containing regimen such as ET may provide a preferential benefit to patients with HER-2/neu-positive tumors.
#2048
Background: The presence of disseminated tumor cells (DTC) in the bone marrow is associated with an increased risk for subsequent bone metastases. Bisphosphonates reduce the occurence of bone metastases in patients (pts) with primary breast cancer (BC) with DTC. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the effect of adjuvant zoledronic acid (ZOL) on DTC in the bone marrow and the Patients and methods: Eligibilty criteria for this prospective, randomized multicenter trial were primary BC pts (pT1-4, N1-2, M0) with positive bone marrow status as determined by a standardized immunocytochemistry staining procedure. Ninety-eight pts were enrolled between April 2002 and January 2006. Randomization and medication had to be started within 28 days of primary surgery. Consenting pts were randomized to the treatment arm (ZOL 4mg i.v. q 4 weekly) or control arm. During the study, all pts received adjuvant treatment in the form of chemotherapy ± hormonal therapy or hormonal therapy alone. Bone marrow aspirations were performed to analyze the presence of DTC at surgery (baseline) and 12 months later. Efficacy and tolerability of intravenous ZOL in pts with primary Result: Bone marrow status was available for 76 patients both at baseline and 12 months after surgery. At baseline a median of 2.0 / range 1-6 (mean 2.1±1.1) DTC were detected in the ZOL group and a median of 2.0 / range 1-35 (mean 2.9±5.5) DTC in the control group. In both groups the number of detected tumor cells decreased during the 12 months follow-up with 0.5±0.8 (median 0.0; 0-2) DTC in the ZOL group and 0.9±0.8 (median 1.0; 0-2) DTC in the control group. By ANCOVA analysis a trend was seen towards a reduction of the number of DTC in the ZOL group compared with the control group (p=0.066). In addition, bone marrow-positive pts treated with ZOL were more likely to become bone marrow negative after 12 months (66.7% versus 35.1%, (p=0.009) compared to the control group. Most frequently reported AEs were musculoskeletal,arthralgia and myalgia in Conclusions: In this first prospective, randomized, multicenter trial we were able to show, that both treatment groups have a reduction in the number of DTC after 12 months as compared to baseline. There is a tendency to more reduction of DTC in the ZOL group. More pts under ZOL achieved a change from positive to negative bone marrow status than controls (p=0.009). Treatment with ZOL was safe and well tolerated.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 2048.
This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.