Preoperatively, all patients should be assessed for the presence of cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, renal, or vascular comorbidity. Presupposing appropriate perioperative measures and surgical technique, there is no reason to contraindicate pneumoperitoneum in patients with peritonitis or intraabdominal malignancy. During laparoscopy, monitoring of end tidal CO2 concentration is mandatory. The available data on closed- (Veress needle) and open-access techniques do not allow us to principally favor the use of either technique. Using 2 to 5-mm instead of 5 to 10-mm trocars improves cosmetic result and postoperative pain marginally. It is recommended to use the lowest intraabdominal pressure allowing adequate exposure of the operative field, rather than using a routine pressure. In patients with limited cardiac, pulmonary, or renal function, abdominal wall lifting combined with low-pressure pneumoperitoneum might be an alternative. Abdominal wall lifting devices have no clinically relevant advantages compared to low-pressure (5-7 mmHg) pneumoperitoneum. In patients with cardiopulmonary diseases, intra- and postoperative arterial blood gas monitoring is recommended. The clinical benefits of warmed, humidified insufflation gas are minor and contradictory. Intraoperative sequential intermittent pneumatic compression of the lower extremities is recommended for all prolonged laparoscopic procedures. For the prevention of postoperative pain a wide range of treatment options exists. Although all these options seem to reduce pain, the data currently do not justify a general recommendation.
ObjectiveA tumor model in the rat was used to study peritoneal tumor growth and abdominal wall metastases after carbon dioxide (002) pneumoperitoneum, gasless laparoscopy, and laparotomy.
Summary Background DataThe role of laparoscopic resection of cancer is under debate. Insufflation of the peritoneal cavity with C02 is believed to be a causative factor in the development of abdominal wall metastases after laparoscopic resection of malignant tumors.
MethodsIn the solid tumor model, a lump of 350-mg CC-531 tumor cells was placed intraperitoneally in rats having C02 pneumoperitoneum (n = 8), gasless laparoscopy (n = 8), or conventional laparotomy (n = 8). After 20 minutes, the solid tumor was removed through a laparoscopic port or through the laparotomy. In the cell seeding model, 5 x 105 CC-531 cells were injected intraperitoneally before C02 pneumoperitoneum (n = 12), gasless laparoscopy (n = 12), or laparotomy (n = 12). All operative procedures lasted 20 minutes. After 6 weeks, in the solid tumor model and after 4 weeks in the cell seeding model, tumor growth was scored semiquantitatively. All results were analyzed using the analysis of variance.
Despite several loss of heterozygosity studies, a comprehensive genomic survey of pheochromocytomas is still lacking. To identify DNA copy number changes which might be important in tumor development and progression and which may have diagnostic utility, we evaluated genetic aberrations in 29 sporadic adrenal and extra-adrenal pheochromocytomas (19 clinically benign tumors and 10 malignant lesions). Comparative genomic hybridization was performed using directly fluorochrome-conjugated DNA extracted from frozen (16) and paraffin-embedded (13) tumor tissues. The most frequently observed changes were losses of chromosomes 1p11-p32 (86%), 3q (52%), 6q (34%), 3p, 17p (31% each), 11q (28%), and gains of chromosomes 9q (38%) and 17q (31%). No amplification was identified and no difference between adrenal and extra-adrenal tumors was detected. Progression to malignant tumors was strongly associated with deletions of chromosome 6q (60% versus 21% in clinically benign lesions, P = 0.0368) and 17p (50% versus 21%). Fluorescence in situ hybridization confirmed the comparative genomic hybridization data of chromosomes 1p, 3q, and 6q, and revealed aneuploidy in some tumors. Our results suggest that the development of pheochromocytomas is associated with specific genomic aberrations, such as losses of 1p, 3q, and 6q and gains of 9q and 17q. In particular, tumor suppressor genes on chromosomes 1p and 3q may be involved in early tumorigenesis, and deletions of chromosomes 6q and 17p in progression to malignancy.
Objective: Phaeochromocytomas (PCCs) are widely known for their clinical unpredictability. This study intends to define predictive plasma markers for their variable postoperative behaviour. Furthermore, the diagnostic accuracy of these plasma tests was determined. Design and Methods: A retrospective correlative study was performed in a series of 83 operated and four autopsied patients in order to correlate preoperative catecholamine (CAT) levels of 103 PCCs with their clinical behaviour. In a subset of cases, chromogranin-A (Chr-A) and enzymes/precursors of the CAT biosynthesis were studied for their predictive value. Results: Basal CAT levels were elevated in 81/87 instances (sensitivity: 93%). Four of six cases with normal measurements showed only medullary hyperplasia. Larger PCCs, particularly those showing necrosis, capsular and vascular invasion, secreted higher CAT levels. Bilateral, hereditary tumours were less productive than their unilateral counterparts. Extra-adrenal PCCs secreted significantly lower levels of epinephrine (EPI) than intra-adrenal tumours. Fourteen patients developed metastases. According to Kaplan -Meier estimations, patients with higher levels of dopamine, norepinephrine (NE) and aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase as well as lower ratios of EPI/EPI þ NE, had significantly shorter metastases-free intervals. Existence of preoperative hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy and measured blood pressures showed significant positive relationships with CAT levels, but not with Chr-A. Conclusions: These data showed that plasma CAT measurement is a sensitive method in the diagnostic work-up of PCCs. Those tumours producing normal levels are commonly small and asymptomatic. Furthermore, certain secretion patterns are indicative of the presence of metastases as well as the size and site of sporadic and syndrome-related PCCs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.