Our findings support the practice of living-donor kidney transplantation as a good means to meet the persisting organ shortage. Further effort must be put into minimizing donor and recipient complications. The specific demands of younger donors should be further elucidated. In addition to medical follow-up, living kidney donors should also be offered lifelong psychologic counseling.
Renal transplant recipients (RTR) have shortened life expectancy, primarily due to premature cardiovascular disease (CVD). Traditional CVD risk factors are highly prevalent. In addition, several non-traditional risk factors may contribute to the high risk. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of renal dysfunction on mortality and cardiovascular complications in 1052 placebo-treated patients of the Assessment of LEscol in Renal Transplantation (ALERT) trial. Follow-up was 5-6 years and endpoints included cardiac death, non-cardiovascular death, all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiac event (MACE), non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke. The effects of serum creatinine at baseline on these endpoints were evaluated. Elevated serum creatinine in RTR was a strong and independent risk factor for MACE, cardiac, noncardiovascular, and all-cause mortality, but not for stroke or non-fatal MI alone. Serum creatinine was associated with increased mortality and MACE, independent of established CVD risk factors. Graft loss resulted in increased incidences of non-cardiovascular death, all-cause mortality, MACE and non-fatal MI. In conclusion, elevated serum creatinine is a strong risk factor for all-cause, non-cardiovascular and cardiac mortality, and MACE, independent of traditional risk factors, but not for stroke or non-fatal MI alone.
The use of echo enhancers has potential to diagnose acute kidney graft rejection in its early stages. US not only identifies kidney perfusion defects but also provides information on the effect of a large peri-renal hematoma.
We found no difference between the successively transplanted kidneys of the same donor, not even for the expanded criteria donor organs. Nevertheless, assuming a 'safe' CIT is not justified, and CIT should always be kept as short as possible.
The improved prognosis and survival statistics of both renal transplantation and dialysis have focused attention on the quality of life offered by these treatments. Using a standardized questionnaire, we assessed the quality of life of 612 patients undergoing renal replacement therapy at our center. Of these patients, 359 had been transplanted and 253 patients were on dialysis. Concerning the sociodemographic data, only the time on specific treatment was longer in dialysis patients than in transplanted patients (49.2 versus 55.6 months, P < 0.05). Most complaints were more common in dialysis patients than in transplanted patients. Only the side effects of medication were seen more in transplanted patients (P < 0.005). Life satisfaction was higher in transplanted patients than in dialysis patients. Dialysis patients were more anxious (P < 0.05) and more depressed (P < 0.001) than transplanted patients. Transplanted patients also felt that they had more social support than did dialysis patients. Overall life quality was almost equal between patients on hemodialysis and patients on peritoneal dialysis, and between patients on the waiting list for transplantation and those not on the waiting list. Despite a significantly better quality of life after renal transplantation, the percentage of patients working remained unchanged. (57.5% versus 57.8%, P = n.s.). We conclude that despite an improved quality of life after renal transplantation, these patients are economically not more productive than patients on dialysis.
Compared to the category, the ARV severity is more closely associated with the initial response to antirejection therapy and long-term graft failure. The sAMRV and AMRV might represent a spectrum of the same disorder.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.