Summary The purpose of this systematic study was to provide an up to date and reliable quantitative summary of the relative benefits of various types of chemotherapy (non-platinum vs platinum, single-agent vs combination and carboplatin vs cisplatin) in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. Also, to investigate whether well-defined patient subgroups benefit more or less from cisplatin-or carboplatinbased therapy. Meta-analyses were based on updated individual patient data from all available randomized controlled trials (published and unpublished), including 37 trials, 5667 patients and 4664 deaths. The results suggest that platinum-based chemotherapy is better than nonplatinum therapy, show a trend in favour of platinum combinations over single-agent platinum, and suggest that cisplatin and carboplatin are equally effective. There is no good evidence that cisplatin is more or less effective than carboplatin in any particular subgroup of patients.Keywords: meta-analysis; systematic review; randomized controlled trials; advanced ovarian cancer; chemotherapy Health care professionals and patients alike are becoming increasingly aware of the need to make medical decisions on the basis of up-to-date, objective and unbiased research (Chalmers and Haynes, 1994). The most reliable information results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Unfortunately, most RCTs, including those conducted in ovarian cancer, have been too small to demonstrate moderate treatment benefits with reliability, and many results have been inconclusive or contradictory. The Advanced Ovarian Cancer Trialists Group (AOCTG) recognized that the best means of synthesizing such randomized evidence is by systematic meta-analysis. In 1988, five meta-analyses of chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer using updated individual patient data were initiated. The first results were published in 1991 (AOCTG, 1991). The AOCTG recognized the importance of updating these results especially for the comparison of carboplatin and cisplatin, in which the data were relatively immature. The comparison of platinum analogues was considered of such clinical importance that further new investigations were initiated to identify whether any particular type of women or tumour would benefit more from either cisplatin-or carboplatin-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODSTrials were eligible for inclusion provided they examined first-line chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer, were properly randomized and made one of the treatment comparisons described below. Trials were identified by bibliographic searches using MEDLINE and CancerLit, by hand searching relevant meeting proceedings and by consulting trial registers (AOCTG, 1991). Both published and unpublished trials were included and updated data were sought for all randomized patients. All data were checked thoroughly and the final database entries for each trial were verified by the responsible trialist or data centre.All analyses were based on intention to treat. Survival analyses were stratified by trial, and t...

This model and scoring system may well predict the outcome of SCR and could potentially be useful in future clinical trials to determine which patients with recurrent ovarian cancer should have SCR as part of their management.

No abstract

The most important cytotoxic drugs for the treatment of ovarian cancer, platinum compounds and paclitaxel, are known to induce neurotoxicity, which is dose limiting when higher paclitaxel doses are used or platinum-pretreated patients are treated. The absolute dose of paclitaxel per course has been demonstrated to be an important risk factor for the development of neurotoxicity. The role of cumulative dose, treatment duration and infusion schedule as additional risk factors are still in debate, and are therefore evaluated in this study. This study evaluates paclitaxel induced neurotoxicity in 38 patients, most of whom had already received platinum treatment, receiving either 135 or 175 mg/m2 as 3-h or 24-h infusion. Patients were compared with an age-matched control group. A detailed questionnaire and neurophysiological measurements including vibration perception threshold were used. Overall, the majority of patients (76%) developed some degree of neurotoxicity, but symptoms were usually mild or moderate with no grade 3/4 neurotoxicity observed. Age has been demonstrated to be an important risk factor for the development of neurotoxicity. Furthermore, the higher dose per course showed a significant impact on neurotoxicity, while the different infusion schedules were of minor importance. Vibration threshold perception, 2-point discrimination, a walking-the-line test, and reports of paresthesias were shown to be the most sensitive and useful parameters for neurotoxicity evaluation. Neurotoxicity is a common adverse event during paclitaxel chemotherapy in platinum-pretreated patients. A clinically useful test panel composed of a detailed history and the above three easily performed neurophysiological evaluations should be incorporated into future studies evaluating new drugs, treatment modifications, new combinations, and potential modulators of chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract