Hydrocortisone did not improve survival or reversal of shock in patients with septic shock, either overall or in patients who did not have a response to corticotropin, although hydrocortisone hastened reversal of shock in patients in whom shock was reversed. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00147004.)

We prospectively studied the impact of an antibiotic prophylaxis regimen on the incidence of infections, organ dysfunctions, and mortality in a predominantly surgical and trauma intensive care unit (ICU) population. A total of 546 patients were enrolled and stratified according to Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE)-II scores. They were then randomized to receive either 2 x 400 mg of intravenous ciprofloxacin for 4 days, together with a mixture of topical gentamicin and polymyxin applied to the nostrils, mouth, and stomach throughout their ICU stay or to receive intravenous and topical placebo. When receiving prophylaxis, significantly fewer patients acquired infections (p = 0.001, risk ratio [RR], 0.477; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.367-0.620), especially pneumonias (6 versus 29, p = 0.007), other lower respiratory tract infections (39 versus 70, p = 0.007), bloodstream infections (14 versus 36, p = 0.007), or urinary tract infections (36 versus 60, p = 0.042). Also, significantly fewer patients acquired severe organ dysfunctions (63 versus 96 patients, p = 0.0051; RR, 0.636; 95% CI, 0.463-0.874), especially renal dysfunctions (17 versus 38; p = 0.018). Within 5 days after admission, 24 patients died in each group, whereas 28 patients receiving prophylaxis and 51 receiving placebo died in the ICU thereafter (p = 0.0589; RR, 0.640; 95% CI, 0.402-1.017). The overall ICU mortality was not statistically different (52 versus 75 fatalities), but the mortality was significantly reduced for 237 patients of the midrange stratum with APACHE-II scores of 20-29 on admission (20 versus 38 fatalities, p = 0.0147; RR, 0.508; 95% CI, 0.295-0.875); there was still a favorable trend after 1 year (51 versus 60 fatalities; p = 0.0844; RR, 0.720; 95% CI, 0.496-1.046). Surveillance cultures from tracheobronchial, oropharyngeal, and gastric secretions and from rectal swabs did not show any evidence for the selection of resistant microorganisms in the patients receiving prophylaxis.

Infusion of stress doses of hydrocortisone reduced the time to cessation of vasopressor therapy in human septic shock. This was associated with a trend to earlier resolution of sepsis-induced organ dysfunctions. Overall shock reversal and mortality were not significantly different between the groups in this low-sized single-center study.

There is increasing evidence that the hypercortisolemia in inflammatory diseases suppresses the elaboration of proinflammatory cytokines, thus protecting the host from its own defence reactions. In severe sepsis and septic shock cortisol levels are usually elevated, but some patients may have relative adrenal insufficiency. This may contribute to the overwhelming systemic inflammatory response syndrome. We evaluated the impact of low-dose hydrocortisone infusion (10 mg/h) on the course of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome. This dose corresponds to a maximum secretory rate of cortisol achieved in corticotropin-stimulated healthy humans. In a prospective observational study 57 surgical patients with severe sepsis or septic shock were studied, of which in addition to the conventional treatment 12 patients were infused with low-dose hydrocortisone, and 45 were treated without any corticosteroid. In the longitudinal analysis the systemic inflammatory response--as judged by body temperature, cardiovascular response, and kinetics of inflammatory mediators such as phospholipase A2, C-reactive protein, and neutrophil elastase--started to differ in favor of the hydrocortisone-treated patients after 2 days of treatment (P < 0.05, Mann-Whitney U test). The difference disappeared after withdrawal of exogenous cortisol. Shock reversal was achieved in all patients treated with low-dose hydrocortisone. The data provide evidence that low-dose hydrocortisone infusion attenuates the systemic inflammatory response in human septic shock. From an immunological point of view a relative cortisol deficiency may contribute to the amplified immune response in systemic inflammatory diseases. A randomized clinical trial must clarify the impact of low-dose hydrocortisone infusion on the clinical course and outcome of septic shock patients.

The risk factors for systemic fungal infections were analysed retrospectively in 186 orthotopic liver transplant procedures performed in 152 patients between June 1985 and January 1993. The total incidence of systemic fungal infections was 16.5% (25/152). The incidence of disseminated candidiasis, aspergillosis, and combined candidiasis and aspergillosis was 6.5% (n = 10), 7.2% (n = 11) and 2.6% (n = 4), respectively. Mortality associated with systemic fungal infections was 80% (20 of 25 patients). There were ten cases of disseminated candidiasis, with 4 patients surviving, and 11 cases of invasive aspergillosis, with 1 patient surviving. All patients with combined systemic fungal infection died. To identify perioperative risk factors, 39 variables were used to compare patients with systemic fungal infections versus those without fungal infections. Fourteen variables were significantly associated with systemic fungal infections by univariate analysis. A consecutive logistic regression analysis revealed that the amount of fresh frozen plasma transfused due to poor initial function of the allograft and acute renal failure requiring hemofiltration were independently significant risk factors for systemic fungal infections. There was no statistical correlation between systemic fungal infections and the underlying liver disease, previous long-term corticosteroids and the postoperative immunosuppressive therapy. Risk factors identified in this study should be considered in the postoperative care of the individual liver transplant recipient. In our study a poor initial function of the hepatic allograft substantially increased the risk of systemic fungal infection.

We interviewed 45 patients, who answered advertisements (n = 21) or were referred by colleagues (n = 24), about their experience of intraoperative awareness using a standardized questionnaire. Auditory perceptions, hearing sounds or voices were mentioned by all patients (45 of 45): 33 of 45 patients understood and recalled conversations; 21 of 45 patients had visual perceptions; 12 of 21 recognized things or faces; 29 of 45 patients felt being touched; three patients had the sensation of moderate pain; and eight patients were in severe pain. Patients' feelings were mostly related to paralysis (27 of 45), helplessness (28 of 45), anxiety and fear (22 of 45); 18 were in severe panic. All patients (45 of 45) recognized the situation as a real event: 22 of 45 patients experienced unpleasant after effects; 11 suffered from anxiety and nightmares; and three developed post-traumatic stress disorder syndrome and required medical treatment. Twenty of 45 patients were especially attentive to emotionally relevant remarks on their own person, their disease and the course of their operation. The accuracy of sensory perception indicates a very high level of cognitive performance of patients during intraoperative awareness.

In a randomized clinical trial the prophylactic effects of locally administered antimicrobials on quantitative colonization and respiratory infections were studied in intubated patients with an expected period of mechanical ventilation of greater than 6 days. Nineteen patients received 50 mg of polymyxin B and 80 mg of gentamicin distributed among nose, oropharynx and stomach at 6-h intervals, as well as 300 mg of amphotericin B in the oropharynx. Twenty untreated patients served as controls. In the control group colonization by respiratory pathogens was more common (oropharynx 19 vs 6 patients (p less than 0.001); trachea 19 vs 11 (p less than 0.01)), and the number as well as the count of the colonizing species was usually higher. Fourteen patients of the control group developed respiratory infections, including nine cases of pneumonia, as compared to four patients with prophylaxis, including one case of pneumonia (p less than 0.01). Pneumonia-associated deaths were prevented with prophylaxis; however, the overall mortality remained unchanged. Respiratory infections in the prophylaxis group were associated with organisms resistant to the agents used, but the overall occurrence of resistance was not increased, as compared to the control group. We conclude that unrestrained upper airway colonization by respiratory pathogens and respiratory tract infection were causally related. Local antimicrobial prophylaxis proved to be a highly effective strategy for the prevention of potentially life-threatening pneumonias in critically ill patients, but in the present study the host setting appeared to be the major determinant of outcome.

Cardiac output measurement is part of routine monitoring in critically ill patients. In patients on extracorporeal lung assist, thermodilution cardiac output measurement may lead to erroneous results caused by indicator loss into the extracorporeal circuit. Seven patients on venovenous extracorporeal lung assist were studied using different extracorporeal blood flows. We compared conventional thermodilution cardiac output determinations with dye dilution cardiac output measurement, with dye injection into the pulmonary artery. The latter method is not affected by the extracorporeal circuit. The conventional thermodilution method overestimated cardiac output up to a maximum of 300%, providing results up to 10 L/min higher than true cardiac output. The mean difference between thermodilution and true cardiac output as determined by dye dilution with pulmonary artery indicator injection was 3.0 +/- 2.41 L/min. There was no correlation between thermodilution cardiac output values and true cardiac output (r = 0.06). We conclude that conventional thermodilution is not a suitable method for cardiac output measurement in patients on extracorporeal lung assist, especially if high extracorporeal blood flows are applied.