Laparoscopic surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease has replaced the open approach in several institutions, and it is likely to become the "standard" for treatment in the near future. Members of five European surgical centers with extensive experience in pathophysiological research, diagnostic testing, and conventional surgery for esophageal disease met after five years of experience in using laparoscopic antireflux surgery, and established a plan to evaluate the potential for consensus among the centers involved in the surgical management of the disease. The consensus process started with a pathophysiological assessment of the reporting requirements for diagnostic workup. To allow a thorough appreciation of the surgical techniques used by all the participants, experience was exchanged in collaborative operations in an experimental surgical laboratory. It was concluded that the pathophysiological background to the disease is multifactorial, as many publications have shown in recent years. The group's meetings and discussions established a consensus list for the preoperative assessment of patients suspected of having gastroesophageal reflux disease, as well as a common list of operative techniques for successful antireflux surgery.

Reported incidence rates of carcinoma in patients with achalasia and the prevalence of achalasia in patients with esophageal cancer vary widely in the literature. The prognosis of an "achalasia-carcinoma" is generally considered poor, although systematic studies assessing the incidence, prevalence, and prognosis of patients with "achalasia-carcinoma" are scant. We investigated the incidence of esophageal cancer in a large series of patients with known achalasia, assessed the prevalence of achalasia in patients presenting with esophageal cancer, and evaluated the prognosis of these patients compared to that of patients with esophageal cancer without achalasia. Between 1982 and 1998 a total of 124 patients with primary achalasia were treated and followed at our department. During the same time period 1366 patients presented with esophageal cancer (879 esophageal squamous cell carcinomas, 487 adenocarcinomas). Of the 124 patients with primary achalasia, 4 developed a carcinoma during a mean follow-up of 5.6 years (i.e., an incidence of one carcinoma per 173.6 patient-years of follow-up). Altogether, 13 of 879 patients (1.5%) presenting with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and 1 of 487 patients (0.2%), presenting with esophageal adenocarcinoma had a history of primary achalasia. Seven patients with achalasia-carcinoma (50%) had early-stage disease (stage I, IIA, or IIB). There was no difference in the prognosis of patients with resected achalasia-carcinoma versus those with esophageal carcinoma but no achalasia. Thus in our population of patients with long-standing achalasia the risk for developing an esophageal cancer was increased about 140-fold over that of the general population. With liberal use of surveillance, carcinoma could often be detected at an early stage in these patients, with a prognosis that was not worse than that of patients with squamous cell esophageal cancer but no achalasia.

No abstract

Endodissection is especially helpful during esophageal dissection at or above the trachea. It allows identification of mediastinal structures and controlled biopsy of mediastinal lymph nodes. This study showed that endodissection eliminates the "blind angle" during conventional THE, prevents recurrent nerve damage, and reduces pulmonary distress during transhiatal esophagectomy.

Despite extensive resection and systematic lymphadenectomy the prognosis of patients with locally advanced gastric carcinoma remains poor. The effect of preoperative outpatient chemotherapy with etoposide, doxorubicin and cisplatin was evaluated prospectively in 30 patients who had been shown by preoperative staging (including endosonography and surgical laparoscopy) to have gastric carcinoma stages IIIA, IIIB or IV. Haematological side-effects were common and necessitated hospitalization in 13 of 30 patients. Complete clinical response to neoadjuvant therapy was observed in eight of 27 evaluable patients. Resection was performed in 27 of 30 patients, with complete macroscopic and microscopic tumour removal in 24. There were no deaths and no major morbidity following operation. On multivariate analysis complete clinical response (P < 0.01) and complete tumour resection (P < 0.01) were the major independent predictors of long-term survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Actuarial survival after complete tumour removal was superior with neoadjuvant therapy compared with results in an age-, sex- and tumour stage-matched control population who had primary resection (P = 0.07). Recurrence occurred in 17 of 23 evaluable patients who had complete tumour removal, with relapse in the tumour bed or area of lymphatic drainage in 11. These data show that neoadjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced gastric carcinoma is feasible and appears to increase the rate of complete tumour removal. More powerful and less toxic regimens are, however, required to improve the response rate and to delay or avoid recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.