In patients with cancer, the screening performance of both the PHQ-9 and the HADS-D was limited compared with a standardized diagnostic interview. Costs and benefits of routinely screening all patients with cancer should be weighed carefully. Cancer 2017;123:4236-4243. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Little is known about the psychological burden patients are left with after successful allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (HSCT). With the main focus on physical condition and common transplant complications, psychological symptoms often remain neglected in daily practice. To assess the prevalence of distress in patients who have undergone allogeneic HSCT, we conducted a cross-sectional pilot study in 50 consecutive patients from our outpatient transplant clinic using standardized questionnaires. Distress was categorized by symptoms of anxiety, fear of progression, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Forty-one patients completed self-administered questionnaires. The median age was 53 years (21-74 years) and the mean time after transplantation was 614 days (25-2070 days). In total, 18 patients (44%) showed symptoms of distress. Among these 18 patients, 11 patients reported symptoms of anxiety, 12 patients suffered from fear of progression, 11 patients showed symptoms of depression and 6 patients of PTSD. Age below 55 years was significantly associated with fear of progression (P ¼ 0.004). This study demonstrates the high prevalence of distress in patients who have undergone allogeneic HSCT. Our results suggest an unmet need for professional support and intervention. These findings may be relevant as distress could have an influence on the outcome after HSCT.

No abstract

Objective: The patient-based evaluation of outcome is gaining increased importance. The aim of the study was to demonstrate the reliability, validity and responsiveness of the German version of the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment Questionnaire (SMFA-D) in patients undergoing surgical or conservative treatment. Methods: Three hundred and thirty-two patients suffering from osteoarthritis of the hip or knee, rheumatoid arthritis or rotator cuff tear undergoing surgical or medical inpatient treatment were followed up for 12 month. Patients underwent both SMFA-D and other assessments and clinical as well as radiological examinations. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the SMFA-D were evaluated. Results: Values of the SMFA-D subscales, Function index (M 22-49, SD 12-20, range 0-96) and Bother index (M 29-52, SD 15-23, range 0-100), showed a normal distribution. Internal consistency (0.88-0.97) and retest reliability (0.71-0.96) coefficients were satisfactory to excellent. In most cases, the SMFA-D correlated significantly with function tests, physicians' function ratings, patients' pain ratings and other quality-of-life questionnaires in all patient subgroups. The results support both the construct and criterion validity of the measure. Different patient groups and subgroups could be discriminated with the SMFA-D scales. The standardized response means of SMFA-D subscales were in surgical patients better than in conservatively treated patients and comparable to those of the SF-36 Physical Component Summary scale. Conclusions: The German version of SMFA is a reliable, valid and responsive questionnaire in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee, rheumatoid arthritis or rotator cuff tear undergoing surgical or medical inpatient treatment. Thus, the use of the SMFA-D in these patients can be recommended.