In the present study we evaluated whether the sitting position during initiation of small-dose combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSE) would induce less hypotension as compared with the lateral position. Sixty women undergoing elective cesarean delivery were randomly assigned to receive a spinal injection consisting of 6.6 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine with sufentanil 3.3 microg in either the lateral or the sitting position. After securing the epidural catheter, patients were turned to a 15 degrees left lateral supine position. Ephedrine 5 mg IV was administered prophylactically and subsequently in case of nausea/vomiting and/or hypotension, defined as a systolic blood pressure less than 95 mm Hg or a 25% decrease from baseline values. Although the incidence of ephedrine supplementation was not different, females in the sitting group required less ephedrine (P = 0.012) and there were fewer problems with identifying the epidural space (P = 0.01). However, more patients in this group required epidural supplementation (35% versus 3%; P = 0.007). In the lateral group, blocks extended more cephalad than with the sitting position (P = 0.014). Apgar scores did not differ, but umbilical artery pH values were significantly higher in patients of the sitting group (7.31 +/- 0.04 versus 7.26 +/- 0.03; P = 0.02). We conclude that performing a CSE technique for cesarean delivery in the sitting position was technically easier and induced less severe hypotension.

A small dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% combined with sufentanil used intrathecally during cesarean section offered a more reliable cephalad spread of the spinal block than the glucose-free combination, which was reflected in a lower incidence of hypotension and nausea.

No abstract

We studied 90 patients undergoing elective Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia who received lactated Ringer's solution 1000 ml with up to 1000 ml of modified gelatin, lactated Ringer's solution 1000 ml with up to 1000 ml of 6% hydroxyethylstarch or only up to 1000 ml of 6% hydroxyethylstarch. Lumbar puncture was performed as soon as 500 ml of the colloid were infused. The incidence of hypotension, number of patients requiring a vasopressor and doses of ephedrine required to restore arterial pressure were significantly lower in favour of those receiving the crystalloid-hydroxyethylstarch combination. In both groups receiving the 2000 ml preload, packed cell volume (PCV) values decreased by more than 20%, which may be of concern in patients already presenting with mild anaemia. In patients who received the colloid without the crystalloid, PCV values decreased by 14% but the risk of severe hypotension was comparable with the crystalloid-gelatin combination.

No abstract

No abstract

Purpose To compare the incidence of nausea, vomiting, and arterial hypotension between carbetocin and oxytocin to prevent haemorrhage after caesarean section (CS). Methods A randomized controlled trial in term pregnant women undergoing planned CS. Groups were randomized to carbetocin or oxytocin. Blood pressure (BP), heart rate, presence of nausea/vomitus, and need for vasopressors were evaluated throughout surgery. Preoperative and postoperative haemoglobin and haematocrit levels were compared. Results Fifty-eight women were randomized (carbetocin n = 32; oxytocin n = 26). Both medications had hypotensive effect, difference in BP for carbetocin versus oxytocin: systolic (14.4 ± 2.4 mmHg versus 8.5 ± 1.8 mmHg); diastolic (7.8 ± 1.6 mmHg versus 8.9 ± 3.0 mmHg) without significant difference between the drugs (p = 0.1 and p = 0.7). Both groups had similar needs for vasopressors. The presence of nausea was not rare, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.4). Average blood loss was slightly lower in the carbetocin group but not statistically significant (p = 0.8). Conclusion In planned CS, a possible clinical significant lower incidence of nausea after carbetocin was noted but this was not statistically significant. There were no differences regarding BP, heart rate, the need for vasopressor, and blood loss. The study was registered in the International Journal of Clinical Trials (ISRCTN 95504420, 2/2017).

It was concluded that epidural PCA induced better pain relief, caused less nausea/vomiting but was more expensive than intrathecal morphine.