Background: There have been few inter-observer studies of diffuse parenchymal lung disease (DPLD), but the recent ATS/ERS consensus classification provides a basis for such a study. Methods: A method for categorising numerically the percentage likelihood of these differential diagnoses was developed, and the diagnostic confidence of pathologists using this classification and the reproducibility of their diagnoses were assessed. Results: The overall kappa coefficient of agreement for the first choice diagnosis was 0.38 (n = 133 biopsies), increasing to 0.43 for patients (n = 83) with multiple biopsies. Weighted kappa coefficients of agreement, quantifying the level of probability of individual diagnoses, were moderate to good (mean 0.58, range 0.40-0.75). However, in 18% of biopsy specimens the diagnosis was given with low confidence. Over 50% of inter-observer variation related to the diagnosis of non-specific interstitial pneumonia and, in particular, its distinction from usual interstitial pneumonia. Conclusion: These results show that the ATS/ERS classification can be applied reproducibly by pathologists who evaluate DPLD routinely, and support the practice of taking multiple biopsy specimens.

The histological grading of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) remains subjective, resulting in inter- and intra-observer variation and poor reproducibility in the grading of cervical lesions. This study has attempted to develop an objective grading system using automated machine vision. The architectural features of cervical squamous epithelium are quantitatively analysed using a combination of computerized digital image processing and Delaunay triangulation analysis; 230 images digitally captured from cases previously classified by a gynaecological pathologist included normal cervical squamous epithelium (n=30), koilocytosis (n=46), CIN 1 (n=52), CIN 2 (n=56), and CIN 3 (n=46). Intra- and inter-observer variation had kappa values of 0.502 and 0.415, respectively. A machine vision system was developed in KS400 macro programming language to segment and mark the centres of all nuclei within the epithelium. By object-oriented analysis of image components, the positional information of nuclei was used to construct a Delaunay triangulation mesh. Each mesh was analysed to compute triangle dimensions including the mean triangle area, the mean triangle edge length, and the number of triangles per unit area, giving an individual quantitative profile of measurements for each case. Discriminant analysis of the geometric data revealed the significant discriminatory variables from which a classification score was derived. The scoring system distinguished between normal and CIN 3 in 98.7% of cases and between koilocytosis and CIN 1 in 76.5% of cases, but only 62.3% of the CIN cases were classified into the correct group, with the CIN 2 group showing the highest rate of misclassification. Graphical plots of triangulation data demonstrated the continuum of morphological change from normal squamous epithelium to the highest grade of CIN, with overlapping of the groups originally defined by the pathologists. This study shows that automated location of nuclei in cervical biopsies using computerized image analysis is possible. Analysis of positional information enables quantitative evaluation of architectural features in CIN using Delaunay triangulation meshes, which is effective in the objective classification of CIN. This demonstrates the future potential of automated machine vision systems in diagnostic histopathology.

Objective 1. To assess inter-and intra-observer variation in the histopathological reporting of cervical colposcopic biopsies using a histologic modification of the cytological Bethesda grading system; 2. to determine the histologic profile of those cases which resulted in diagnostic disagreement.Methods Consecutive cervical colposcopic biopsies (n = 125) were assessed independently by six experienced histopathologists. Cases were classified as normal, low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Six months later the process was repeated. The degree of inter and intra-observer variation was assessed by kappa statistics. All cases in which there was less than perfect inter and intra-observer agreement were reviewed by the coordinator of the study. ResultsIn the first round of the study inter-observer agreement was generally poor, with unweighted and weighted kappa values ranging from 0.15 to 0.58 (average 0.30) and from 0.21 to 0.61 (average 0.36) respectively. In the second round inter-observer agreement was better, with unweighted and weighted kappa values ranging from 0.08 to 0.55 (average 0-33) and from 0.22 to 0.59 (average 0.42). Ten of the 15 pairs of observers achieved fair inter-observer agreement using weighted kappa analysis. The degree of intra-observer agreement was better, unweighted and weighted kappa values ranging from 0.26 to 0.61 (average 0.47) and from 0.34 to 0.62 (average 0-51) respectively. Two of the six participants achieved fair intra-observer agreement and two achieved good intra-observer agreement using weighted kappa analysis. There were marked difficulties in the separation of normal squamous epithelium from low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and in the separation of low grade from high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. Histopathological review revealed that many of the difficulties in the separation of normal and low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion were in the distinction between superficial vacuolated cells and true koilocytes. Difficulties also resulted in the separation of basal cell hyperplasia, inflammatory associated changes and immature squamous metaplasia from low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Conditions which resulted in difficulty in the separation of low grade and high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions included florid koilocytotic change and immature metaplastic squamous epithelium with atypia. In some cases, there was a full spectrum of diagnoses from normal to high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. These were largely cases of immature metaplastic squamous epithelium with atypia and of thin or atrophic squamous epithelium with atypia.Conclusions Most pairs of observers can achieve fair inter-observer agreement in the reporting of cervical colposcopic biopsies using a modified Bethesda system. Intra-observer agreement is also generally fair to good using this system. It may be that a two tier grading system is more appropriate for the histopathological reporting of these biopsies than the tr...

Aims-To assess interobserver variation in reporting cervical colposcopic biopsy specimens and to determine whether a modified Bethesda grading system results in better interobserver agreement than the traditional cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grading system. Methods-One hundred and twenty five consecutive cervical colposcopic biopsy specimens were assessed independently by six histopathologists. Specimens were classified using the traditional CIN grading system as normal, koilocytosis, CIN I, CIN II, or CIN III. The specimens were also classified using a modified Bethesda grading system as either normal, low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) or high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL). Participants were also asked to categorise biopsy specimens by the CIN system with the addition of the recently proposed category "basal abnormalities ofuncertain significance (BAUS)". Conclusions-Interobserver agreement in the reporting of cervical colposcopic biopsy specimens using the CIN grading system is poor. Agreement, while still poor, is better when a modified Bethesda grading system is used. There is little or no consensus in the diagnosis of BAUS. (7 Clin Pathol 1996;49:833-835)