Background: Optimal management of elderly patients (≥70 years) with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains debatable. We compared survival and treatment of advanced NSCLC between elderly and younger patients. Methods: From the cancer registry, we identified 188 patients treated with chemotherapy for stage IV NSCLC. Patient characteristics, survival, toxicity, chemotherapy regimen and response were compared between age groups (patients 50-69 vs. ≥70 years). Results: There were 96 young and 92 elderly patients. The majority were male (70%) and had adenocarcinoma (53%). More elderly had an ECOG performance status >1 (59 vs. 42%, p = 0.04). Median survival was longer for young patients (11.5 vs. 10.8 months, hazard ratio, HR 1.43, p = 0.04). Patients ≥75 years had a significantly worse outcome compared to the young and patients aged 70-74 years (11.5 vs. 12.8 vs. 7.7 months, HR 1.71, p = 0.01). Hospitalization rate did not differ. Elderly had more hematological toxicities (56 vs. 32%, p = 0.01) and less frequently received first-line platinum combinations (96 vs. 69%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Elderly patients had a marginally worse survival compared to young patients. Despite the less frequent use of combination chemotherapy, elderly patients experienced toxicity more often. Survival of those ≥75 years was significantly worse, indicating the urgent need of further research particularly in this age group.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.