A new production development scheme was proposed for one of the major offshore fields in the Gulf. To assist building assurance of the delivery of this scheme, subsurface uncertainty evaluation was initiated; firstly based on an in-house approach and later through the use of commercial softwares. The proposed study is primarily focused on dynamic reservoir uncertainties. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of the reservoir uncertainties on plateau duration period in the prediction phase. The workflow, based on experimental design and response surface, advantages and outcomes of this study are presented and its limitations discussed. This study was completed over a short period of time, thanks to an optimization of the CPU resources. This was a key advantage obtained while carrying large models with long history exceeding 50 years. The study resulted in successfully delivering probabilistic profiles (P90, P50, P10) in order to assure the production delivery of the proposed development scheme and enables to develop risk mitigation plans. A ranking of the most influential uncertainty parameters with quantification of their interactions is obtained. Consideration is also given to the history match quality, which results in reducing the parameters distributions and highlights the value of the data acquisition. Introduction ADMA launched a study to assist building assurance of the delivery of new production development scheme and to assess the risk of applying such strategy. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of the reservoir uncertainties on plateau duration period in the prediction phase. This study come up with a probabilistic forecast (P90, P50, P10) instead of a single deterministic forecast as usual. First, ADMA launched the study in-house in two phases. The fist phase is simple and based on mono-parameter sensitivity at a time method but requires a large number of runs and doesn't evaluate the impact of interactions between parameters. 13 parameters are used and 4 runs are generated for each parameter. The second phase is based on the Monte Carlo analysis. After assigning a probabilistic law to each uncertain parameter, n realizations of the uncertain parameters are picked to obtain a sample of n reservoir simulations. This method is expensive in terms of number of reservoir simulation runs (at least 100 runs for 10–15 parameters). Secondly, ADMA called for two companies and their commercial softwares (X and Y) to tune the study further. ADMA's optimized methodology is based on experimental design and response surface modelling to model flow simulations. The same 13 uncertain parameters have been considered for this Field study. Those parameters have been re-evaluated and constrained by historical data in order to reduce uncertainty range and they were assigned a new distribution law. Using new ranges and distribution laws, uncertainties are propagated and probabilistic production forecasts are obtained. The work flow of this study is shown in figure 1.
At first, the risk assessment of dynamic model parameters based on uncertainty analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of the reservoir uncertainties in a carbonate reservoir, offshore Abu Dhabi. The study showed that the evolution of gas to oil ratio (GOR) was a main reservoir response that affected the future production profile; hence it is the focus of this paper. It is important to track the GOR behavior in the field, to compare the actual reservoir performance with the risk assessment results and to evaluate the proper reservoir management and development options. Uncertainty analysis was used to evaluate future GOR performance and its probability of occurrence. The range of production plateau duration was also quantified. Therefore, future GOR performance impact on production for all probability ranges can be estimated. Finally, "GOR performance indicator" was developed by use of GOR upside and downside performance curves generated as a result of uncertainty studies. More than three years of monitoring GOR evolution by use of the developed GOR performance indicator allows the assessment of GOR behavior trends against the expected performance, which permits the development of adequate reservoir management plans. The GOR trend can be explained as a result of reservoir management actions such as optimizing gas injection rate, adjusting well production rate and closing high GOR (HGOR) oil producers. Accordingly, the GOR trend can indicate the current reservoir performance compared to the range of uncertainty analysis. It also can put light on required reservoir management action plans for operations and assist building assurance of the reservoir development. Consequently, the developed "GOR performance indicator" is based on the reservoir simulation outputs for uncertainty analysis. In case that the GOR trend is deviating from the range of the GOR performance indicator, the reservoir simulation inputs needs to be modified. The developed GOR performance indicator is considered useful to foresee required reservoir management action plans and to suggest alternative development plan needs in case of unfavorable actual reservoir performance. It is noted that the GOR performance indicator can be updated based on new information available. Additional data gathering can support to narrow uncertainty ranges.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.