Background: Glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists differ in chemical structure, duration of action and in their effects on clinical outcomes. The cardiovascular effects of once-weekly albiglutide in type 2 diabetes are unknown. Methods: We randomly assigned patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease to the addition of once-weekly subcutaneous injection of albiglutide (30 mg to 50 mg) or matching placebo to standard care. We hypothesized that albiglutide would be noninferior to placebo for the primary outcome of first occurrence of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. If noninferiority was confirmed by an upper limit of the 95% confidence interval for the hazard ratio of less than 1.30, closed-testing for superiority was prespecified. Findings: Overall, 9463 participants were followed for a median of 1.6 years. The primary composite outcome occurred in 338 of 4731 patients (7.1%; 4.6 events per 100 person-years) in the albiglutide group and in 428 of 4732 patients (9.0%; 5.9 events per 100 person-years) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI ], 0.68 to 0.90), indicating that albiglutide, was superior to placebo (P<0.0001 for noninferiority, P=0.0006 for superiority). The incidence of acute pancreatitis (albiglutide 10 patients and placebo 7 patients), pancreatic cancer (6 and 5), medullary thyroid carcinoma (0 and 0), and other serious adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups. Interpretation: In patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, albiglutide was superior to placebo with respect to major adverse cardiovascular events. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline; Harmony Outcomes ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02465515.) noninferiority; P = 0.06 for superiority). There seems to be variation in the results of existing trials with GLP-1 receptor agonists, which if correct, might reflect drug structure or duration of action, patients studied, duration of follow-up or other factors.

Background: Sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy can improve glycemic control, compared with multiple daily insulin injections or with insulin pump therapy alone, without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia. Subjects and Methods: A 12-month observational study in patients with type 1 diabetes treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), upon the introduction of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), was conducted in 15 countries (in Europe and in Israel) to document the real-life use of SAP and assess which variables are associated with improvement in type 1 diabetes management. Results: Data from 263 patients (38% male; mean age, 28.0 -15.7 years [range, 1-69 years]; body mass index, 23.3 -4.9 kg/m 2 ; diabetes duration, 13.9 -10.7 years; CSII duration, 2.6 -3 years) were collected. Baseline mean glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA 1c ) was 8.1 -1.4%; 82% had suboptimal HbA 1c ( ‡ 7%). The average sensor use for 12 months was 30% (range, 0-94%), and sensor use decreased with time (first 3 months, 37%; last 3 months, 27%). Factors associated with improvement in HbA 1c after 12 months in patients with baseline HbA 1c ‡ 7% were high baseline HbA 1c (P < 0.001), older age group (P < 0.001), and more frequent sensor use (P = 0.047). Significantly less hospitalization, increased treatment satisfaction, and reduced fear of hypoglycemia were reported after 12 months of SAP. Conclusions: This is the largest and longest multicenter prospective observational study providing real-life data on SAP. These results are consistent with those of controlled trials showing the effectiveness of CGM in pump users.

AimsTo compare the safety and efficacy of a simpler titration algorithm for insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) with that used in previous DUAL trials in insulin‐naïve patients with type 2 diabetes.Research design and methodsThis 32‐week, open‐label, non‐inferiority trial randomized adults with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on metformin ± pioglitazone to receive IDegLira, titrated either once weekly, based on the mean of 2 pre‐breakfast plasma glucose (PG) readings (n = 210), or twice weekly, based on the mean of 3 pre‐breakfast PG readings (n = 210).ResultsMean HbA1c decreased from 8.2% (65 mmol/mol) to 6.1% (43 mmol/mol) with once‐weekly titration and from 8.1% (65 mmol/mol) to 6.0% (42 mmol/mol) with twice‐weekly titration; non‐inferiority was confirmed (estimated treatment difference: 0.12% [−0.04; 0.28]95% CI, 1.30 mmol/mol [−0.41; 3.01]95% CI). Approximately 90% of patients achieved HbA1c < 7% in each arm. Mean fasting PG was similar after 32 weeks. Weight change was −1.0 kg vs −2.0 kg for once‐weekly vs twice‐weekly titration. Rates of severe or blood glucose‐confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia were low in both arms: 0.16 events/patient‐year of exposure (PYE) for once‐weekly, 0.76 events/PYE for twice‐weekly titration. Mean IDegLira dose at 32 weeks was 41 dose steps (41 U IDeg/1.48 mg Lira) for both arms. Overall adverse event rates were 207.8 and 241.3 events/100 PYE with once‐weekly and twice‐weekly titration, respectively.ConclusionA pragmatic titration algorithm with once‐weekly adjustments based on 2 PG readings resulted in a safety and glycaemic efficacy profile similar to that with twice‐weekly adjustments based on 3 preceding PG values in insulin‐naïve patients.

In both pediatric and adult populations with type 1 diabetes (T1D), technologies such as continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), or sensor-augmented pumps (SAP) can consistently improve glycemic control [measured as glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and time in

No abstract