This article addresses President Clinton's call for a National Voluntary Mathematics Test (NVMT) in the eighth grade. First, we discuss the form and content of the NVMT. Our analysis suggests that several unanswered questions regarding the validity of the test devalue the information it can provide for students, parents, and teachers. Second, we describe the consequences of implementing a national test of student performance. We contend that these consequences require additional policy initiatives designed to address the effects of test implementation. We conclude that the enactment of the NVMT as currently proposed is unwise.AUTHORS' NOTE: The authors collaborated equally in the writing of this article. Correspondence and requests for reprints should be sent to Christopher Hartmann,
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.