Objective To describe physical function outcomes and modes of physical therapy intervention for a cohort of patients with dysvascular lower extremity amputation (LEA) during the prosthetic training phase of rehabilitation. Design A retrospective cohort study. Setting Physical rehabilitation clinics at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center and a University Hospital. Patients Forty-two patients (38 men, 4 women, age 60.2±8.4 years) who completed outpatient physical therapy rehabilitation with prosthetic training after dysvascular LEA. Methods All patients underwent a prosthetic training phase of rehabilitation, with standardized outcome measures performed at initiation and discharge. Main Outcome Measures Performance-based physical function measures included: Two-Minute Walk (2MW), Timed-Up and Go (TUG), and 5-meter gait speed. Self-report physical function measures included: the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire – Mobility Section (PEQ-MS) and the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS). Rehabilitation dose was tracked as total number of clinic visits, rehabilitation duration, and specific intervention modes. Results There were significant improvements in 2MW (mean±SD) [67.5±29.9 m (initial) and 103.3±45.8 m (discharge) (p<0.001)], gait speed [0.58±0.27 m/s (initial) and 0.88±0.39 m/s (discharge) (p<0.001)], TUG [34.8±21.3 s (initial) and 18.6±13.9 s (discharge) (p<0.001)], PEQ-MS [2.2±0.9 (initial) and 2.8±0.8 (discharge) (p<0.001)], and PSFS [3.2±2.0 (initial) and 5.9±2.3 (discharge) (p<0.001)]. Performance-based (TUG) and self-report (PEQ-MS) changes in functional mobility from initial exam to discharge had low or no correlations with rehabilitation dose measures. Number of clinic visits was 12.7±13.1 and rehabilitation duration was 13.7±16.8 weeks. Conclusions Significant improvements in performance-based and self-report measures of physical function occurred during the prosthetic training phase of physical rehabilitation following dysvascular major LEA. Despite improvements in function, gait speed and TUG outcomes remained below clinically important thresholds, indicating patients were limited in community ambulation and at risk for falls. Lack of moderate or higher correlation between rehabilitation dose and outcome measures may indicate need for more specific rehabilitation dose measures.

III.

Background: People with lower-limb amputation (LLA) are routinely prescribed a socket prosthesis; however, many socket prosthesis users experience severe complications with the fit of their prosthesis including residual limb wounds and pain. Osseointegration is a procedure that creates a direct connection between the bone and prosthetic limb through a bone-anchored prosthesis, eliminating the need for a socket interface. It is offered as a secondary procedure to people with LLA who experience significant complications with socket prostheses. Objectives: To evaluate change in disability and function 1 year postosseointegration compared with preosseointegration in people with LLA. Study design: Single group, pretest, and post-test. Methods: Twelve participants (9 transfemoral and 3 transtibial amputations, age: 44 6 10 years, 7 female participants, 14 6 12 years since amputation) with unilateral LLA underwent osseointegration with press-fit implants. Disability was measured with the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0, and function was measured with both Prosthetic Limb Users Mobility Survey and the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale. Questionnaires were administered preosseointegration and 1 year postosseointegration. Paired t tests assessed change in outcomes between time points. Results: Postosseointegration, participants demonstrated reduced disability measured with World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (%D 5 252.6, p 5 0.01), improved mobility measured with Prosthetic Limb Users Mobility Survey (%D 5 21.8, P , 0.01), and improved balance confidence measured with the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (%D 5 28.4, P , 0.01). Conclusions: Participants report less disability and greater function in their prosthesis postosseointegration. Osseointegration is a novel procedure for people experiencing complications with their socket prosthesis, and this study is the first to show improvements in disability postosseointegration.

No abstract

No abstract