Sp1, Sp3 (SPR‐2) and Sp4 (SPR‐1) are human sequence‐specific DNA binding proteins with very similar structural features. In this report, we have analyzed Sp3 in direct comparison with Sp1. We have raised antibodies against both Sp1 and Sp3, and show that Sp3 protein, like Sp1, is expressed in various cell lines. Co‐transfection experiments in different mammalian cell lines reveal that in contrast to Sp1 and Sp4, Sp3 is not able to activate several Sp1 responsive promoters. In addition, Sp3 also fails to activate reporter constructs in Drosophila SL2 cells lacking endogenous Sp factors. Instead, we find that Sp3 represses Sp1‐mediated activation in a linear dose‐dependent manner. A mutant of Sp3 lacking the DNA binding domain does not affect activation by Sp1, suggesting that the inhibition is most likely due to the competition with Sp1 for their common binding sites. To determine if any structurally similar domain of Sp3 is able to replace partially homologous domains of Sp1, we have generated chimeric proteins and tested their activation characteristics in gene transfer experiments. It appears that neither the glutamine‐rich domains A and B nor the D domain of Sp1 can be replaced by the homologous regions of Sp3. Our results suggest that Sp3 is an inhibitory member of the Sp family.

Previous analyses of the uteroglobin gene promoter revealed a GT1 box which is also found in the SV40 enhancer. The GT1 element in the context of the uteroglobin promoter is active in Ishikawa cells, a human endometrial cell line, but not in HeLa cells. Here we report the cloning by recognition site screening of two factors (SPR-1 and SPR-2) which bind to this GT1 motif. SPR-1 and SPR-2 are homologues of the transcription factor Sp1. All three proteins are closely related members of a gene family encoding proteins with very similar structural features. Like Sp1, SPR-1 and SPR-2 contain glutamine and serine/threonine rich amino acid stretches. Most significantly, the DNA binding domains of all three proteins are highly conserved and they recognize GT as well as GC boxes identically. SPR-2 mRNA is expressed ubiquitously, whereas SPR-1 transcripts are abundant in the brain but barely detectable in other organs. The possible function of these factors for the activity of the uteroglobin promoter is discussed.

Recently, a family of transcription factors structurally related to Sp1 has been described; thus, more than one activator may bind to the GC boxes present in a number of viral and cellular promoters. We have compared the transactivation potentials of Sp1, Sp3 and Sp4 proteins on the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) promoter. The long terminal repeat (LTR) of HIV-1 contains three binding sites for the transcription factor Sp1 (GC boxes) which are involved in both basal and Tat-mediated transcriptional activation. Moreover, a cooperative interaction between NF-kappa B and Sp1 is required for HIV enhancer activation. We now demonstrate that Sp4 is an activator, while the Sp3 protein represses basal expression of HIV promoter. Remarkably, we found that over-expression of the transcription factor Sp3 was able to suppress Tat-mediated transactivation. These inhibitory effects of Sp3 correlate with its DNA binding activity, suggesting that Sp3 inhibition involves competition with Sp1 for occupancy of the GC boxes. Next, we have analyzed the role of different Sp1-related proteins in the stimulation of HIV-1 promoter in response to mitogens. We found that the binding of NF-kappa B is not by itself sufficient to induce HIV gene expression. Instead, an interaction between NF-kappa B and the trans-acting domain (A domain) of Sp1 bound to an adjacent site must occur. We found that the cooperative interaction between NF-kappa B and Sp1 is highly specific, since neither Sp3 nor Sp4 is capable of cooperating with NF-kappa B.

Sp4 is a human sequence-specific DNA binding protein with structural features similar to those described for the transcription factors Sp1 and Sp3. These three proteins contain two glutamine-rich regions and a highly conserved DNA binding domain composed of three zinc fingers. Consistently, Sp1, Sp3, and Sp4 do have the same DNA binding specificities. In this report, we have embarked on a detailed analysis of the transcriptional properties of Sp4 in direct comparison to Sp1 and Sp3. Cotransfection experiments into Drosophila SL2 cells lacking endogenous Sp factors demonstrate that Sp4 is an activator protein like Sp1. However, in contrast to Sp1, Sp4 is not able to act synergistically through adjacent binding sites. The transactivation function of Sp4 resides, like that of Sp1, in the N-terminal glutamine-rich region. Sp4 can function as a target for the Sp1 activation domains in a superactivation assay, suggesting that the activation domains of Sp1 and Sp4 are functionally related. Furthermore, we show that Sp4-mediated transcriptional activation can be repressed by Sp3. Taken together, our results demonstrate that the transcription factor Sp4 exhibits specific functional properties distinct from Sp1 and Sp3.The properly timed and coordinated expression of eukaryotic genes requires the combinatorial action of multiple sequencespecific DNA binding proteins. These transcription factors recognize distinct promoter and enhancer elements, thereby acting positively or negatively on transcription. One of the first and best characterized mammalian transcription factors was Sp1 (1, 2) which binds to GC boxes and related motifs (3) present in many promoters. However, Sp1 is not the only protein binding to and acting through these DNA motifs. At least two other more recently cloned human proteins, designated Sp3 and Sp4, do bind with identical affinity to the same recognition sequence as Sp1 (4). Note that Sp2, yet another factor homologous to Sp1, seems to have DNA binding specificities different from Sp1, Sp3, and Sp4 (5).Sp1, Sp3, and Sp4 represent a family of GC box binding proteins with very similar structural features. In addition to the highly conserved DNA binding domain close to the C terminus, all three proteins contain two glutamine-and serine/ threonine-rich amino acid stretches in the N-terminal part of the molecule. For Sp1, the glutamine-rich domains have been identified as transactivation domains (2, 6). Two additional domains of Sp1 (C and D) located adjacent to the zinc finger region also influence the transcriptional activation function, one being weakly basic (C) and the other (D) showing no significant homology to known activation domains (6). The D domain of Sp1 plays a key role in mediating the ability of Sp1 to activate transcription synergistically (7).The high degree of structural conservation between Sp1, Sp3, and Sp4 suggested that Sp3 and Sp4 do exert similar activation functions. A functional analysis of Sp3 using transfection experiments into mammalian cell lines and into Drosophila SL2 cell...

Previous analyses of the uteroglobin promoter revealed seven distinct regions, which contribute to its overall activity in epithelial cells from endometrium and lung. Most significantly, a mutation of the promoter sequence around 65 base pairs upstream of the transcriptional start site severely impairs promoter activity. The transcription factor acting through this sequence has not been identified yet. Here, we report that members of the Sp transcription factor family specifically recognize this non-classical GC box, in addition to another functional motif located 230 base pairs upstream of the transcriptional start site. We have characterized in detail the interaction of recombinant Sp3 with both motifs by DNase I footprinting and methylation protection using the wild-type uteroglobin promoter and various linker scanning mutants as templates. Electrophoretic mobility shift analyses show that Sp1 and Sp3 both bind with similar affinity to these elements. We demonstrate that the DNA-binding proteins in the endometrial cell line Ishikawa which recognize these motifs are also Sp1 and Sp3. Gene transfer experiments into Drosophila Schneider cells that do not contain endogenous Sp factors revealed that both DNA motifs respond to transiently expressed Sp1 and Sp3. Our results show thus that the level of transcription from the uteroglobin promoter is controlled by members of the Sp transcription factor family through unusual Sp binding sites.