OBJECTIVETo determine the impact of the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) criteria on 1) gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) diagnosis compared with the American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria and 2) the fasting plasma glucose (FPG) to predict GDM.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSIn 10,283 pregnant women undergoing a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) for universal screening of GDM, two FPG thresholds (of the OGTT) were used to rule in and to rule out GDM.RESULTSThe IADPSG and ADA criteria identified GDM in 3,875 (37.7%) women and 1,328 (12.9%) women, respectively (P < 0.0005). FPG thresholds of ≥5.1 mmol/l ruled in GDM in 2,975 (28.9%) women with 100% specificity, while <4.4 mmol/l ruled out GDM in 2,228 (21.7%) women with 95.4% sensitivity. FPG independently could have avoided the OGTT in 5,203 (50.6%) women.CONCLUSIONSThe IADPSG criteria increased GDM prevalence nearly threefold. By circumventing a significant number of OGTTs, an initial FPG can greatly simplify the IADPSG diagnostic algorithm.

The guidelines of the various professional committees, being based on consensus and expert opinion, show major discrepancies in their ability to identify women with GDM and their capacity to predict adverse pregnancy outcome. Only evidence-based criteria derived from reliable and consistent scientific data will eliminate the confusion caused in clinical practice.

No abstract

Both gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and thyroid dysfunction in pregnancy compromise maternal and fetal health. The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of abnormal thyroid function and antithyroid antibodies during early pregnancy in a population at high risk for GDM. Serum free triiodothyronine (FT3), free thyroxine (FT4) and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) were measured in 301 pregnant women who underwent routine 'universal screening' for GDM. The antithyroid peroxidase antibody (antiTPOAb) was also quantified in 255 of these women. GDM was confirmed by a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test using World Health Organization criteria. No statistically significant difference was found between the 80 (26.6%) women with GDM and the 221 (73.4%) women without GDM for any of the thyroid function tests. In the cohort tested for antiTPOAb, the 51 (20.0%) women who were positive for antiTPOAb had higher mean TSH (1.57 +/- 2.49 mIU/l; p < 0.001) than the women negative for antiTPOAb. Seventeen (5.6%) women had low FT4 while 12 (4.0%) women had high TSH; 28 (9.3%) women had low serum TSH, among whom three (1.0%) also had high FT4. The significantly higher prevalence of hypothyroxinemia and antiTPOAb titers than generally reported warrants routine screening for thyroid abnormalities. This screening, which can be effectively and easily incorporated into screening practices already in place for GDM, would result in improved obstetric care.

Despite all the progress in methodology, HBA1c remains a poor test to screen for GDM.

The value of the FPG as a screening test for GDM is highly dependent on the diagnostic criteria. The performance is excellent with the ADA criteria. With the other criteria, the high FPR (poor specificity) would limit its utility as a screening test. Regardless of the criteria used, initial testing by FPG can significantly decrease the number of cumbersome OGTTs needed for the diagnosis of GDM.

No abstract

No abstract