Background: Anterior vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a growth modulating and fusionless treatment option that is considered as a new promising method for the management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). This prospective cohort study aimed to present the minimum 2-year results of anterior VBT applied to 21 skeletally immature patients with AIS. Methods: Twenty-one skeletally immature patients with a diagnosis of AIS were included. A decision to proceed with surgery was established after the detection of curve progression despite the brace (>40 degrees) with a minimum curve flexibility of 30%. Results: Patients had an average age of 11.1 and an average follow-up period of 27.4 months. All patients underwent thoracoscopic placement of thoracic screws, from the convex side of curves. An average of 7.1 levels of tethering was undertaken. Average preoperative major thoracic curve magnitudes improved from 48.2 to 16 degrees on the first erect postoperative x-ray, and to 10 degrees at the last follow-up (P<0.001). Immediate postoperatively, 1 case with chylothorax was detected and treated conservatively, and another case with tether breakage was detected at the third postoperative year and replaced thoracoscopically. No other major complication was acquired. Conclusions: Anterior VBT as a growth modulating treatment option by allowing the correction of the scoliotic deformity and preserving coronal balance was detected to be a safe and effective option for the surgical treatment of AIS in skeletally immature patients, if applied under strict inclusion criteria. VBT by allowing preservation of spinal segmental motion is yielding promising radiographic results without causing any major complications. Level of Evidence: Level IV.
BACKGROUND The purpose of open reduction and internal fixation of acetabulum posterior wall fractures is to restore anatomical structure and stability of the hip joint, in order to start weight bearing as soon as possible and prevent hip arthrosis; restoration of the anatomy should preserve function of the joint as well. Although “special shaped precontoured plates” have been developed in recent years for surgical treatment of this region, studies comparing the traditional plates with the newly designed precontoured plates are lacking. AIM To evaluate the biomechanical properties of precontoured anatomic buttress and conventional curved reconstruction plates (CCRPs) for posterior wall acetabulum fracture treatment. METHODS Twelve pelvis models were created for testing plate treatment of fracture in the posterior wall of the acetabulum. These 12 pelvis models were used to create 24 hemipelvis models (experimental) by cutting from the sagittal plane and passing over the center of gravity, after which the posterior wall acetabular fractures (of similar type and size) were created. In these experimental models, the right acetabulum was fixed with a 5-hole CCRP, while the left was fixed with a precontoured anatomic buttress plate (PABP). Samples were placed through the test device and were subjected to static load testing, with a constant testing velocity of 2 mm/min until the load reached 2.3 kN or the acetabular fixation failed. Dynamic tests were also performed with sinusoidal wave load, with a maximal load of 2.3 kN and a load ratio of 0.1. RESULTS The average stiffness values were 460.83 ± 95.47 N/mm for the PABP and 291.99 ± 118.58 N/mm for the 5-hole CCRP. The precontoured anatomic acetabulum buttress plates had significantly higher rigidity than the CCRPs ( P = 0.022). There was a statistically significant difference between the unloaded and 2.3 kN-loaded values of AL (posterosuperior fracture line vertical to the ground surface) and CL (posteroinferior fracture line vertical to the ground surface) parameters for both the PABPs and the 5-hole CCRPs ( P = 0.036 and P = 0.045, respectively). According to the static tests, the amount of total displacement was significantly less in the PABPs than in the CCRPs. Comparative analysis of the displacement in the BL (posterior wall fracture line horizontal to the ground) parameter yielded no statistically significant differences between the PABP and the 5-hole CCRPs ( P = 0.261). CONCLUSION PABP provides more stable fixation in acetabulum posterior wall fractures than 5-hole CCRP, allowing for proximal or distal fracture line screw application without reshaping.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.