The article is devoted to information security issues in the world and in Azerbaijan, in particular. The article compares laws and regulations of Azerbaijan and other countries in the cybersecurity policy between them. The article reveals the features of the organisational and legal regulation of the information security system as an integral part of state security. A number of aspects of ensuring information security through legal and technological means, as well as a number of features of ensuring the security of certain categories of information, are highlighted. Recommendations and conclusions from the policies of both jurisdictions are presented.
Formation of e-governance has resulted in the leading role of information in the digital society. Thus, the main feature of the information society is the participation of all members of the society in the interchange of information. Therefore, information creativity has become a subject of discussion as a modern form of freedom of artistic creativity. Of course, this is not about simple information, but rather the creation of knowledge, which is the most superior form of information. Such information creativity makes necessary to regulate intellectual property issues and restrictions on information creativity. In the article werer analyzed these issues and were put forward suggestions and recommendations.
Changing and developing world outlook in modern society also has an impact on illegal behavior. As traditional methods do not meet the requirements of the time, ICTs are increasingly being used as a new method and tool for violating human rights and committing different offences. This also requires strengthening the fight against cybercrimes. In the article were put forward suggestions and recommenda-tions for the development of human rights protection mechanisms that have been violated by cybercrimes in the global information society.
The development of new technologies also has an impact on human rights. In the previous “epochs” of global information society, it was stated that that traditional rights can be exercised online. For instance, in 2012 (and again in 2014 and 2016), the UN Human Rights Council emphasized that ‘the same rights granted to people, so to speak, in an “offline” manner, must be protected online as well’. This, in its turn, implicitly brought to the reality that the new technetronic society did not create new rights. Though, we should take into consideration that in the digital world national legislative norms that guarantee the confidentiality of personal data often do not catch up with the technological development and, thus, can’t ensure confidentiality online. Therefore, the impact of digitalization on human rights within the frames of international and national laws should be broadly analysed and studied. The article’s objective is to analyze the impact of new technologies on human rights in the context of the right to be forgotten and right to privacy. Because the development of new technologies is more closely linked to the security of personal data. With the formation of the right to be forgotten, it is the issue of ensuring the confidentiality of certain contents of personal data as a result of the influence of the time factor. The authors conclude that, the right to be forgotten was previously defended more in the context of the right to privacy. However, they cannot be considered equal rights. The right to be forgotten stems from a person’s desire to develop and continue his or her life independently without being the object of criticism for any negative actions he or she has committed in the past. If the right to privacy contains generally confidential information, the right to be forgotten is understood as the deletion of known information at a certain time and the denial of access to third parties. Thus, the right to be forgotten is not included in the right to privacy, and can be considered an independent right. The point is that the norms of the international and national documents, which establish fundamental human rights and freedoms, do not regulate issues related to the right to be forgotten. The right to be forgotten should be limited to the deletion of information from the media and Internet information resources. This is not about the complete destruction of information available in state information systems. Another conclusion of authors is that the media and Internet information resources sometimes spread false information. In this case, there will be no content of the right to be forgotten. Because the main thing is that the information that constitutes the content of the right to be forgotten must be legal, but after some time it has lost its significance. The scope of information included in the content of the right to be forgotten should not only be related to the conviction, but also to other special personal data (for example, the fact of divorce).
The article is devoted to the problems related to development and systematization of information legislation of the Republic of Azerbaijan. In this regard, international norms, complex laws and bylaws are analyzed. The authors conclude that there are different collisions in the information regulations. These collisions are analyzed in depth, and adjustment of national norms to the international standards and adoption of the unique Information Code of the Republic are recommended for the problem solution.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.